User talk:Drvalsummers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Article[edit]

Hi Valerie, a good place to ask questions like this would be Wikipedia's teahouse. Have you published your draft anywhere on Wikipedia yet? I can't find it in your contributions. Graham87 05:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with...

Drvalsummers (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just begun to add citations to the article I uploaded to my sandbox this week. I have lots of questions and hope someone will help me with the formatting until I get the hang of it.

For starters, when I click on the cite button, nothing seems to happen. When I click a second time, I get the drop-down list of templates, then I'm good to go. Is this what is supposed to happen?

When I enter the details into a the template field, the citation information is entered within the text of my article on the edit screen. That's a lot of information and it makes it hard to read the article in edit. Is all the citation information supposed to appear within the text?

How do I use the citation templates to enter citation information about a chapter in a book, rather than the entire book? Drvalsummers (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drvalsummers and Welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like everything is working as it should. It can be difficult to read the article in the edit screen but there is a preview button below the edit box to allow you to see what your edit will look like without saving. If you wish to cite a specific chapter in a book you can add |chapter= to the Cite book code to allow you to specify the chapter. I will also add some other helpful links below for you.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. I'm almost, somewhat beginning to get the hang of this!Drvalsummers (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Drvalsummers! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mcmatter and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is so confusing that it's hard not to give up. I do read the help pages but topics are scattered and I have trouble finding answers to my questions. I'm still working on citations. I have so many to add, that I'm doing 6-8 a day. Today, I added citations, clicked save and got an error message that nothing was saved. Ok. I will redo them. But, in the meantime, I've noticed that if I don't enter the citations in the order of where they need to appear in the text, that Wikipedia doesn't number them correctly. So now I have a mish-mash of citation numbers in my text. 1, 2, 3, 8, 4, 5,6, 10 , 9 for example. Am I going to have to go in and delete every citation I've added and re-enter them all in exact order they are supposed to appear? I've probably messed up on the way I'm supposed to respond to a comment on my 'editing user talk:drvalsummers (section) page. So, I'll give up and just hope somebody sees this message. Perhaps I should use palm fronds. Drvalsummers (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Drvalsummers (talk) 00:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As near as I can tell, you haven't done anything incorrectly. The reason some of your numbers are "out of order" is because you've used them twice (e.g. refs 11 and 12), which is exactly how they should appear. So... looks good. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 01:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
::Thanks for your help. I'm almost, somewhat beginning to get the hang of this! Drvalsummers (talk) 23:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Hi. I noticed your recent post on Stevietheman's talk page about the article on Joseph McCormack that you are working on. I don't recognize that name, but I did write most of the articles on Luke P. Blackburn and William Goebel, so your comments about McCormack's ties to both piqued my interest. I've been around Wikipedia for almost 10 years now, and I have an interest in Kentucky history. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions, and good luck on getting your McCormack article ready for the main space. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I shouldn't have assumed that Stevietheman was the one who wrote about Blackburn and Goebel. As an editor, can you access my sandbox before I submit my piece to the editors? Feel free to take a look. I still have a lot of tweaking to do. Yes, I would very, very much like to talk to someone about Kentucky history. I no longer live in Kentucky, although I made a trip to Louisville once or twice a year to do research. Joseph McCormack, among other things, is credited for establishing the public health system in Kentucky while he was executive officer of the State Board of Health from 1883-1913. He also served in the House of Representatives. His son, Arthur, also a national figure, was Public Health Commissioner from 1913-1943. He was also executive secretary of the Kentucky Medical Association and editor of the KMA Journal at the same time. So these two men set up and "ran" medicine and public health in Kentucky for 60+ years. We don't think of medicine and public health as being political, but their enemies called this the "McCormack Machine." A historian of the American Medical Association wrote that Joseph was the most influential person in the AMA during the Progressive Era, perhaps in its entire history. You can find them in the Kentucky Encyclopedia although those articles don't do them justice. Drvalsummers (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Drvalsummers (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Re: What is correct way to include page numbers when using Named References?[edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Liz Read! Talk! 11:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A page you started (Joseph N. McCormack) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Joseph N. McCormack, Drvalsummers!

Wikipedia editor MrX just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your contribution to our encyclopedia!

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For your excellent work on Joseph N. McCormack Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, the only reason I made the edit to your article was I came across it by chance, and seen a couple of items that had to be fixed per manual of style. That's all did, I just fixed the manual of style, and added the defaultsort for categories. I'm not an admin and have no idea how you would go about moving your article back to draft where you can work on it. I would try leaving a message for an admin on their talk page and I'm sure they will move it back for you. Try User talk:C.Fred, he's always helpful when I ever I need a little help with something. Cmr08 (talk) 01:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arthur T McCormack.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur T McCormack.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Drvalsummers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]