User talk:Digital witchdoctor
Dupe[edit]
I used it to mean duplicate. If you look at the edit, the result of a previous edit duplicated "on human design", once before the ref and once after. I don't see the item OrangeMike added as advertising. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
ah - thank you, I can see you need shorthand for such a common thing.
Advertising is in the eyes of Orange Mike, who decided WP:IMPERFECT does not apply, and then sabotaged the article by putting in the most outrageous and undignified promotion for the Harper Collins book.
I suspect he is playing games with me now?--Digital witchdoctor (talk) 01:47, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- I really think you should reconsider if you are the right person to cover this subject. You seem very passionate about it and that can lead to problems with neutral point of view etc. It's a short quote from the blurb of a book, presented as being nothing mooe or less than the publishers claim. If I compare this to the draft you posted on your blog where the opening pargraph was "Human Design is an original, different, and powerful set of ideas that challenge traditional scientific and religious explanations. It is fast gaining popularity among both "new age" and also traditionally minded people notably in America and Europe." - that's a rather more substantial bald set of assertions presented as the wikipedia articles conclusion, it's promotional. WP:IMPERFECT is about not requiring perfection, it isn't about not requiring any standards at all. When an article has been deleted through a deletion debate it is not uncommon to require a usefied version to be created and bought upto a basic standard before being moved to mainspace where futher improvements can occur --82.7.40.7 (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I am totally clear that I am NOT the one to cover the subject. My role is merely to introduce it. The energy to Mutate. The moment that I contributed, the moon aligned and I flowed with the joy of action. That is it. The rest is fall out, in a way. It is enough to live my life as me.
I don't want to get too technical with the modalities of Human Design, it urges most people to WAIT to RESPOND, and avoid initiating anything. So that does sheepify everyone rather, me too I suppose, most days, we all get rather docile when we get into HD. On 9 April, mostly while I slept, suddenly 11 hours of whoosh, I want to INITIATE, happens every six months of so, with planetary alignments, it just happened and I felt, wow, let's do THIS, ENJOY MYSELF. It was the annual convention in Toronto, and also Ra Uru Hu's birthday, just a moment that aligned, and I experienced incredible, temporary, nostalgic bliss all that day. It was a personal coming of age, doing something just as me, f.. the world, nobody needs to understand, and yes, as a 5/2 profile, exhibitionism is present, a yearning to the collective, my chart has explanation, mutation, struggle, and education, it is just a me moment, natural and unforced, judge as you will.
But I knew once that whoosh was gone, there is no sustainable energy for ME to continue. Mahalo - my sacral or body energy - said leave it now, the moment is complete. My old brain, trained as a child, rewarded as an adult, nothing connected to material reality and flow, back from the grave comes the Digital Witchdoctor, but maybe I will reclaim both aspects of my split HD chart in future and breathe these together more?
The publishers PROMOTIONAL words are NOT secondary reference about Human Design, they are advertising and primary and affiliated and biased words to sell a book, they are not given the same editorial consideration at all as when Harper Collins said, OK, lets publish this one. Are you wikiguys all soft in the logic department? There is NO contribution to the topic Human Design in that publishers blurb, it is about the claimed success of one man, and makes everyone who knows anything think, crap. That statement is utter balls. Ra Uru Hu makes MILLIONS of dollars, owns the legal rights, tens of thousands of readings, millions of people interested, there is nobody anywhere near as successful, on any measure, but the nearest stars are not Chetan Parkyn, no way. Oh he will become successful, all right, and that is wikipedias NPV? Shit and sugar.
If I can be bothered, if it is simply a click UNDO THIS horendous but now old alteration, I may find the energy, but life moves on. Will the ash cloud cancel my flight to Paris... you know, I am sitting by the Mekong River in Phnom Penh, I cannot be bothered with wikipedia today, but YOU, ah, YOU are someone worth talking to.
Thank you. The article cannot be found by other people whilst hidden in User:Mikemahalo, and the problem is, that anyone who actually INITIATES the next step, does not know his Human Design. Allow others to RESPOND to the article in mainspace, where they can find it, that is the Human Design way.
I do not see the problem to have some holding stub in mainspace, so that anyone searching wikipedia for Human DEsign gets a minimal stub, to say, the NOTABILITY is established now. No details yet suitable, one work in progress...
Best wishes
Mahalo--Digital witchdoctor (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)