User talk:DigitalAlchemistbd

This is DigitalAlchemistbd's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janvi Singh (March 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for the submission!! Wikipedia has strict notability guidelines, so even though people may have sizable social media presences, Wikipedia doesn't permit articles about them until they have a handful of mentions by reliable sources from this list: WP:RSP. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janvi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DigitalAlchemistbd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Crunchydillpickle

I appreciate your guidance. I would like assistance in improving the Janvi Singh page and getting it accepted. Could you please provide specific recommendations or point me in the right direction? Your help is much appreciated.

Thank you, DigitalAlchemistbd (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo authorship[edit]

I notice that the photo that you uploaded seems to be of professional quality. You say it's your own work; are you perhaps Janvi Singh's publicist? -- Hoary (talk) 07:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i'm Janvi Singh DigitalAlchemistbd (talk) 08:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your candour, DigitalAlchemistbd. Look, this draft is not going to work as an article: you first need journalists, etc, to write articles about you in newspapers, magazines, etc. (Incidentally, interviews and interview-based articles won't count.) By then you'll be a lot better known, and people you've never met or heard of will want to write a draft or article about you. (They won't necessarily do this skillfully, but they'll try.) So I suggest that you forget about this draft. (And definitely do not pay some company to create an article about you. A company would fail to deliver anything, or deliver junk.) Instead, concentrate on your career. Good luck! -- Hoary (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you dear DigitalAlchemistbd (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janvi Singh (March 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not meeting general notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janvi Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 02:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]