User talk:Cubix1990

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This post is either trolling or a sign you shouldn't be editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you assume my support of Qanon[edit]

My issue is with using a label without sufficient evidence and thus helping to build am accurate Wikipedia.

Just bacuase you can debate or don't have the evidence on why they are labeled far right you should not block me. But either way I will continue to post each day until I receive an answer from you.

This is the problem with the modern left, no platform instead of debate. Cubix1990 (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you continiue to post with any account or Ip adress, that account or IP adress will be blocked due to WP:EVADE. Blocks are per individual, not per account. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no broken any rules here, I was asking a legitimate question, the block was unnecessary. Cubix1990 (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|1= I was blocked for questioning the validity of a label included within a topic, there was so supporting evidence to the claim and the source was an online article that also provided no proof or evidence for the movememt being far right. When I questioned this, using the methods suggested by Wikipedia I was blocked Cubix1990 (talk) 12:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]

Ok, let me check with you on a couple of things: Do you think that the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, which claims that the Democratic party is running a Satanic pedophile ring in the basements of Washington DC pizza parlors, is:

Debunked?
Unlikely?
Debatable?
Plausible?
Proven?

Also, on what grounds would do you refer to QAnon as merely being opposed to pedophilia? Ian.thomson (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 13:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cubix1990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

thanks Doug, however I do not belive my original ban was due to the second account, in fact that is why I created it, I was asking a legitimatequestion and then Ian Thomson blocked me amd claiming I am supporting Qanon, which is irrelevant. I dont understand why my perfectly acceptable question was deleted and why I was originally blocked

Decline reason:

WP:NOTHERE, WP:RGW, WP:CIR. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 05:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that my block was an error. I didn't read the top of the page and see the indefinite block. Doug Weller talk 05:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020-08 conservatism in the US[edit]

Hello,

In special:diff/973972545 you wrote « The only thing I can think of is their support of the current president of the United States, however he is definitely not far right, based on his policies » Antisemitism, racism, opposition to abortion, opposition to universal health insurance, are far-right policies. If you didn't get the memo: the Republican party (except the RINO), Fox news, breitbart.com, WorldNetDaily, One America News Network, Christian Broadcasting Network, are not conservative. They are far-right. Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel and Theresa May are conservative. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]