User talk:Connecticut Puritan
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Connecticut Puritan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations in Draft:Nathaniel Bartlett[edit]
Hi Connecticut Puritan, I saw your posting at the Teahouse and went to have a look at your article. I was actually on the brink of moving it straight to mainspace, as it's well-written and well-referenced, when I did a little check for copyright violation. Oops... here's the result: [1] - the red-marked text was identified as a copyright violation. It looks as if you copied a large amount of material from the History of Redding website.
That, I'm sorry to say, is not permitted. Text in articles has to be original formulations, and can't be duplicated form other people's work. That is because we release our material under a license that allows anyone to reuse it for whatever purpose, including commercial. If we featured material that is copyvios of existing text, we would in essence be telling everyone to steal and broadcast the original author's creations. Can't do it; the only exception is text that is already released as free-to-reuse-by-everyone, and the History of Redding website makes no mention of such a thing.
Before this becomes suitable for main article space, the copied sections will have to be restated in your own words. Looks like a bit of work; sorry about that. But copyright is one thing that admins take very seriously here, and if the article went out in this state, it would probably be deleted within a day. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel Bartlett has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)A page you started (Nathaniel Bartlett) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Nathaniel Bartlett.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Great job. Have you thought about submitting a Did you know WP:DYK?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Nathaniel Bartlett moved to draftspace[edit]
I wasn't joking in what I said above... this is almost a complete copyvio, and can't go into mainspace like this. Bkissin, don't you even run these things through Earwig??? Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:14, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio report again, just in case: [2] --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ummm... wow. So if I run it now, in current draft form, the detector completely fails to detect anything [3] - presumably because of the AfC header. Bugger me sidewise with a coracle. Apologies, Bkissin. But man, that is not encouraging any trust in the tool :[ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Apology accepted Elmidae. You were right, I didn't put this through Earwig before accepting, that's definitely on me. However, when I looked at the list on User:SQL/AfC-ORES it didn't even show up. Bkissin (talk) 22:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Connecticut Puritan (sorry for monopolizing your talk page to this extent ) - I was just made aware of something that I should have considered: are you the original author of the text at History of Redding? In that case I can understand why you thought you could just use it here! However, I'm sorry to say that's not the case. The copyright clause applies even to material that you created and published elsewhere yourself, if it has not been expressly released under a suitable license. If you wish you can release this text in this manner (making it everyone's free-to-play toy for evermore :); it takes a little bit of paperwork but people do it all the time. Let me know if you want to do this; it might be less work than rephrasing the lot for purposes of the Wikipedia article. (I've stuck a copyvio remainder at the top of the draft for the time being, just in case. This can be removed once the issue has been dealt with.) Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived[edit]
|
Hi Connecticut Puritan! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Please Check Your Email[edit]
Please check your email as there are emails you've been waiting for which seem to have not been noticed. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel Bartlett has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Did You Know[edit]
Now that the article about Bartlett is back in mainspace you might be interested in submitting a "Did you know?". These are interesting tidbits from new articles which appear on the Main Page which gets millions of hits a day. Articles in DYKs can receive thousands of visits as a result. While I am not an expert in this process, I might be able to help you if you are interested and have any questions about the process. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that this is an international encyclopaedia written in English, it is not a US encyclopaedia and as such "our nation" could be any country in the world where the reader is. The whole second sentence of the lead needs to be recast in a more neutral tone or probably best just deleted. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC)