User talk:Chrisisreed

Archives

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Chrisisreed}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

March 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Schneider's Bakery, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schneider's Bakery. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magical Golden Whip:I've been editing on here for over 10 years. I fail to understand your logic that my edits weren't constructive. I literally properly cited the California Business Search the EXACT same was it's cited for Walt Disney Pictures. The correct date Schneider's Bakery was formed was August 1999, as proved without doubt by the legal state of California documents. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that trumps that information. It doesn't matter the first show the company didn't produce wasn't for another 5 years, the company was established in 1999. Where are your sources the company was established in 2003? Zero you have zero, you've cited no sources. Where as I have proven my sources. Your edits are being disruptive to the accuracy of Wikipedia. Chrisisreed (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources do not go in the edit summary, you most properly format the source in the article. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Schneider's Bakery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are being unconstructive and disruptive to wikipedia. You aren't paying attention to any of the edits you keep undoing. You say I haven't cited my source, but it is an inline citation in the very first sentence of the article. Don't threaten me with limiting my editing powers. You are 100% the issue here. @Magical Golden Whip: I have properly cited sources you are dismissing and reverting, you are providing nothing to the article, and you are failing to cite your source the company was established in 2003. Chrisisreed (talk) 15:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just found the source in the article. I was wrong on this one. I was looking at the info box. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you acknowledging the mistake. Could you please change it back so my citation continues to be sourced, now other people have gotten involved in the “edit war.” @Magical Golden Whip: Chrisisreed (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi Chrisisreed. Thank you for your work on Great Southwest Corporation. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]