User talk:Cassiopeia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centralizing project discussion

When a project includes multiple operational pages, it is generally best to redirect their discussion pages to the main discussion page for the project. That way, participants remain aware of what is going on with the project without having to search out every nook and cranny where discussions may be taking place.

The exception to this strategy is when a task is delegated that would generate a great deal of discussion, and centralizing it with the project's other discussions would create a discussion page of unmanageable size.

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}


ESPN[edit]

If you're making the argument that ESPN cant be used for UFC fighters, we're going to have a TON of references to remove. Theres five on that Paulo Costa article alone. And for that matter, UFC.com wouldnt be considered independent either. Nswix (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nswix UFC is not an independent nor reliable source. We use UFC only when there is no other source can be used for info such as back then reach and stand for the fighter (now we can obtain almost all current UFC fighters' stand and reach from Tapology). We use UFC ranking for fighter as source and extremely limited fighter (direct info) of fighter bjj belt or other things. If we can find other sources to sub UFC source, pls do and highly encourage. ESPN is in contract with UFC and heavyly connected to each other for such make ESPN not independent for UFC and UFC fighter related pages. We dont use ESPN as sources and if the info can be found in ESPN, it always can be found in other MMA sites. (Note: ESPN used to buy content from Sherdog as back then they dont have they own reporters for MMA content and use Sherdog database until not long ago.) We can use extremely sparingly primary source when it is directly of the subject such as fighter's personal info or UFC ranking from UFC site (note: the UFC ranking is not ranked by UFc but by 21 MMA media which UFC records the outcome each week on their site instead on the respective MMA media sites). Cassiopeia talk 03:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Algorithm69 on Northeast Regional (00:10, 10 May 2024)[edit]

How do i use my sandbox --Algorithm69 (talk) 00:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Algorithm69 Good day. "HERE" is your sandbox. Sandbox is like a note book/scape book that you can testing or testing and experimenting with editing. I suggest you to complete WP:TWA to understand Wikipedia guidelines and editing. Cassiopeia talk 12:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A question about vandalism[edit]

Let's say I think of a way to vandalise an article I find funny. Is there a way I could publish it in a good and safe way (see below for my thoughts on this)?

I used to plan to do it and undo it right after that. I even tried it once, although it happened to be something rather hard to undo and even harder to completely get rid of bad effects. However, now I realise that that may lead to bans if the rules don't care about immediate reversion. Maybe putting it on the talk page would be good, but I'm not sure. Sometimes I may want the vandalism to be not very noticeable, but still published in some form. Orisphera2 (talk) 23:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961, Orisphera2, and Liz: Looping Joseywales1961 and Liz as both of you have comments on Orispera2 edits. Good day Orisphera 2, I believe you find me via CVUA page which mentioned by Joseywales1961. First of all, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and not a social media site for info added/changed in the article needs to be supported by independent, reliable source for verification by the editor who makes the edit. So if you vandalize Wikipedia articles/pages, you will be warned and lead up to a block or ban in regardless of your reasons to do so. All edits are recorded permanently in Wikipedia and always can be viewed by anyone. I am surprised you would write to me to seek my advice if there is a way to vandalize Wikipedia that can go little notice even after you have been told you will be blocked if you continuing to do so. The answer is NO. If your intention is to vandalize Wikipedia for your own amusement, then I suggest you to stop editing immediately for you are not here to contribute to the project but instead have the intention to harm it. Cassiopeia talk 02:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What article do you mean by "the article"? Orisphera2 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What's bad about making a change and immediately undoing it? Orisphera2 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a social media I can use to share these? Orisphera2 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My intention isn't to vandalise Wikipedia for my own amusement, but one of my intentions is to share some interesting ways it can be, without it ending up on the shown version for more than the minimum time needed for me to make and undo it. However, I'd like to make some non-vandaliatic changes, too. I don't think I know all of them in advance, but I think they're good. Orisphera2 (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #627[edit]

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
This is the Wikidata summary of the week before 2024-05-13.
Please help Translate.

Discussions

Press, articles, blog posts, videos

Tool of the week

Newest properties and property proposals to review

You can comment on all open property proposals!

Did you know?

Development You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

Weekly Tasks

· Unsubscribe · Help translate · Mohammed Abdulai (WMDE) (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-20[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Chinazaekpere Goodluck Ukado (05:13, 14 May 2024)[edit]

how do I get my biography uploaded on wiki? --Chinazaekpere Goodluck Ukado (talk) 05:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Altberry65 (23:25, 14 May 2024)[edit]

I just finished edited a new page .How long does it usually take to hear if its acceptable for Wikipedia? --Altberry65 (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]