User talk:Capankajsmilyo
| This is Capankajsmilyo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 15 days  |
Barnstars[edit]
|
The Jain Barnstar | |
| For your contribution to the 'Jainism' related articles. --(nimit) |
- Thank you :D-- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 14:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Hi Pankaj, thanks for your contribution to government related projects. You are valuable for Wikipedia. Keep it up. Thanks again.-- Human3015TALK 10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC) |
- Thankyou Human3015 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you Pankaj for your fantastic contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism. I have been following your edits and it is heartening to note that you have brought new enthusiasm to 'Jainism' related articles. Your articles on Jain monks and Jain temples are very important. Keep up the great work, looking forward to working with you. Aayush18 (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot Aayush18 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I've seen you a couple of times, and just wanted to thank you for your continuous, helpful contributions. Cheers! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot. Coming from you, this means a lot. :D -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| For your ceaseless efforts at Mahavira, Digambara and Jain monasticism despite the major issues we had to face. I am sure you will learn from these reviews and it will help you write a lot of wonderful articles in the future! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
The Jain Barnstar | |
| For your contribution to the Jainism related articles. --Nizil (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thankyou Nizil Shah -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter[edit]
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter[edit]
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter[edit]
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)