User talk:Bodhipup

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Reason I Jump, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. What I am trying to do is ESTABLISH a neutral point of view in the article. The version I edited egregiously violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The criticisms of the book The Reason I Jump should be placed in a "Controversies" section rather than in the main body of the article. Language such as "alleged" discredits the book and author and implies (without convincing or widely accepted evidence) that the stated author did not write the book and/or that there is a general consensus that the author did not write the book. Language of "researchers dismiss all claims that Higashida actually wrote the book himself" is patently false without evidence showing a breadth of criticisms. Such evidence is not provided. There is no widespread agreement, either among psychologists or the general public or in the autistic community, that Higashida did not write the book. To state that there is, without evidence, clearly violates the NPOV policy. Again, criticisms of the book, including by researchers and others, can be placed in a "Controversies" section and explored fully there. Also, the version I edited violates Wikipedia's Disability/Style Advice by using language and terminology that is NOT preferred by the group in question. While person-first language used to be the standard, there is an emerging consensus in the autistic community that "person with autism" is offensive. For the reasoning, see this post at the Autism Self-Advocacy Network. For the research showing the consensus, see "Does Language Matter" in the Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. My edits are intended to ESTABLISH a neutral point of view in this article and follow the disability style advice. Simply restoring the original version does not bring the article into alignment with Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Bodhipup (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Gagliano (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monica Gagliano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Bodhipup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red

asilvering (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Gagliano has been accepted

Monica Gagliano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)