User talk:Bics
Forever Young[edit]
Hi Bics. We're not permitted to add song lyrics to Wikipedia articles (unless the lyrics are in the public domain) because of the copyright issues. --Paul Erik 06:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Basis Instrument Contract[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Basis Instrument Contract, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basis Instrument Contract. Thank you.
- You are welcome to justify the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basis Instrument Contract. It will only be deleted if consensus is reached that it fails to meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The concern was not that it was original unpublished research, but that there are no references to coverage by media or industry sources. The lack of Google hits tends to back up this concern. Rcawsey (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.
However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is unduly harsh.I have written 1 article that is being considered self promo . I dispute this fact.
Decline reason:
Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. —Travistalk 02:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I am not entirely familiar with the article in question, but I do have one comment. Although this is the first time I've ever heard of the World Intellectual Property Organization, I gather that it is an international organization akin to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Only a fraction of the ideas, devices, and whatnot listed at the USPTO are considered notable by our standards, and the same thing goes for any other intellectual property organization. If you wish to dispute your block again, please read the guide and address the reason for your block. Thank you. —Travistalk 02:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I contacted the person who deleted that article for the first time it for days and they did not respond. The first article did not have wipo reference so i added it and thought it was fine. there is no established pattern to justify a user block Bics (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I badly need to recover the article; I received no fair notice of improper activity
Decline reason:
You were blocked because of your username, for which no notice is required. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am again appealing the decision to ban me and asking for help in recovering the article. I badly, badly need to recover the content of this article. I spent three days writing it and the proposed deletion AfD notice outlined when I went to sleep yesterday that the article would stay there for at least five days. Instead when I woke up in the morning, the article was deleted AND I was banned with my IP without warning. I have tried several attempts to recover my article but being in China, deletopedia is not accessible and I cannot write to any editor on the site who may help me do it. So if you do not want to unblock, please at least help me get the article back. Thank you. Bics (talk) 14:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I simply need a userfy of the article Basis Instrument Contract or have a copy emailed to me. I have no other means of making the request that i know of.Please help. thanks
Decline reason:
Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 16:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I had this username for over 2 years and it never was a pb. Bics (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appeal this block. I understand that I was blocked because my username was Bics and I appeared to be promoting an article about BICs in violation of Wikipedia policy.
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is not free webhosting. You will not be unblocked unless you pledge to focus on other areas, not your own non-notable theories. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The block is no longer necessary because I clearly understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again (I will no longer contribute anything relating to BICs unless it has reached the standard of notability wikipedia demands) and I will make productive contributions instead. The only reason I am in this situation is that I did not understand wikipedia rules with respect to this kind of activity and now I do understand.
Now I simply need a userfy of the article Basis Instrument Contract or have a copy emailed to me. I have no other means of making the request that i know of.Please help. thanks Bics (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. I will contact the blocking administrator and let him know about this. In my opinion the username "bics" is innocuous enough that should you avoid any conflicts of interest and self-promotion, I don't think there would be a problem in unblocking you. If you are unblocked, post a message on my talk page and I will be happy to place a copy of Basis_Instrument_Contract in your userspace. Protonk (talk) 00:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- On the contrary, Bics' very first edit in 2006 was to advertise his work on BICs, and he has a very consistent history of using this account to push his own theories on BICs and to get them before the public. This is a blatant spamusername, and must remain blocked. (Note that he does not promise to stop editing about BICs, only to hold off "unless it has reached the standard of notability wikipedia demands" (and he is arguing in various AfD discussions that the subject is already notable). --Orange Mike | Talk 14:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appeal this block again and again
Decline reason:
You've had a number of unblock requests at this time and still don't show that you understand that Wikipedia is not free webhousing or a place for your non notable theories. You have been offered options and seem unwilling to accept them.You have made enough unblock requests at this time, doing so again may result in page protection. Sandahl (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As I have said over and over again I did not see anything wrong with anything I have done with respect to wikipedia policy,so there was no need for covering up my username and NOW I DO. Using the exact language that you suggested,I pledge to focus on other areas, not on BICs. I will not write anything on BICs. I do not how more clear I can be in my pledge so, If this language is still not satisfying to you, please simply suggest the language and i will copy and paste it as a pledge. Now I simply need a userfy of the article Basis Instrument Contract or have a copy emailed to me. I really need it ASAP. I have no other means of making the request that i know of.Please help.thanks Bics (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Bics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appeal again because I have expressed in every possible language that I UNDERSTAND that Wikipedia is not free webhousing or a place for MY non notable theories. I Have even asked for suggestions on formulations, and I am asking again
Decline reason:
It seems as though this has been handled below; if you still wish to be unblocked, please put up another request. Note that your username as it currently stands also violates our username policy, so it may be easier to simply create a new account. Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was banned without being given an opportunity to make a copy of the work that I contributed. If you could simply give me a copy of that work which is work that I painstakingly produced, you will not hear from me again. I think requesting to have my work back is fair. After that you can do whatever you see fit to do. AGAIN I SIMPLY WANT A COPY WORK THAT I CONTRIBUTED AND THAT WAS DELETED WITHOUT GIVING ME ANY OPPORTUNITY TO SAVE IT. FOR EVERYBODY'S TIME AND ENERGY'S SAKE IT WOULD BE BEST TO SIMPLY GIVE ME A MEANS OF GETTING THAT COPY. THANK YOU Bics (talk) 05:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I emailed you a copy a few days ago, did you not get it? Protonk (talk) 06:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
First, thank you Protonk for the expressed intent. No I did not get the e-mail. Which e-mail address was it sent to? If it is k-------@yahoo.com, can you resend it ? Please put a BICs related title on it. MANY MANY THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR CONCERN. Bics (talk) 07:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
GOT IT. THAT IS ALL I WANTED. Thank you Protonk. Many thanks again. Many many thanks. Bics (talk) 07:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of BICs Markets[edit]
A tag has been placed on BICs Markets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. — neuro(talk) 13:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)