User talk:Atrapalhado

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manoel da Costa Ataíde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mariana. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Feilding, 1st Earl of Denbigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1st Duke of Buckingham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Attribution at Lad mag

Hi Atrapalhado, I provided retroactive attribution in the edit summary of this diff for the content you moved from Lad culture. For future copying, just be sure to note it in the edit summary (with a wikilink to the original page). This is needed to satisfy attribution requirements as described at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

thank you for doing this Dan Atrapalhado (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for creating New Man (gender stereotype), your work is appreciated! Jr8825 • Talk 02:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Duke of Buckingham

You claim to be unable to find the quotation I sourced. Put quotation marks round the final sentence and paste it into Google Search. That will take you to a 19C publication which mentions the sender of the report. It may be that you really don't know about that particular search technique, so I'll leave you to do the work and learn from it. Sweetpool50 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@Sweetpool50 Hi I genuinely did try to fine it on Google, and I've just tried again with the sentence ""the Duke staggered, he turned about, uttering only this word, 'Villain!' and never spoke a word more." which isn't bringing anything up. But if the sources are so readily available you could have provided the citation in the time you've spent writing to me? Best wishes. Atrapalhado (talk) 21:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@Sweetpool50Thank you - that looks great, really interesting.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Your recent editing history at Terceira Island shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gummycow ^moo 00:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Shannon Airport

I understand that you are afraid of proper sourcing, which is a massive problem on airport articles. But that you are coming with threats of edit warring reports is rather unfriendly and not in the best interest of Wikipedia. The Banner talk 11:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

The whole thing was a bit silly and petty. To be honest, I think if you'd politely explained this point about sourcing being an issue in airport articles, and what you were trying to acheive, it would have helped. Atrapalhado (talk) 11:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

It has been discussed many times before. Maybe not at the article but at least in Wikiproject Airport. But airport articles are often the target of unsourced fancruft and marketing. Something you should be aware of. The Banner talk 11:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earl of Desmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Copston Magna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oratory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Chick lit

A-class needs two impartial reviewers. See: Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria. Schierbecker (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High Cross, Leicestershire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rugby, A5 and Watershed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Goy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Goy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Goy

The article Goy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Goy and Talk:Goy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Goy

The article Goy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Goy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)