User talk:Alexaneybold

This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Spring_2021) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Alexaneybold, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Alexaneybold! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Photographs/ Captions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback[edit]

This article was well written and easy to understand because it made use of proper grammar and punctuation. The writer remained neutral and only presented facts, which were supported by sources, and not personal opinions on the topic. The subtopics that were included were a good addition to the article because they provided more depth and information which overall increased the understanding of the article. The sources presented were reputable and reliable, they were mostly secondary sources which included articles with statistical information, there weren't any opinionated sources which would have been unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicoleOdiadi (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]