User talk:97.106.151.168

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edit warring at Bob's Burgers (season 2) and other articles[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.106.151.168 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was never doing any disruptive editing. GrapeSoda22 keeps mistakening the manufacture on demand DVD cover as the legit DVD cover. I keep telling that user that mod titles are only sold exclusively online but that user refused to listen. This is the same rule that applies to some TV shows who never had a physical DVD release and instead have either the promotional poster or digital cover art for that season.

Decline reason:

This sounds like a good content discussion to have on the article's talk page, instead of reverting to your preferred version. Kuru (talk) 04:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While your block remains in effect, you are not permitted to blank an unblock decline. --Yamla (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per the data at this user talk you are the same person as User:S hannon434. You must not edit using this IP during the time that your registered account is blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am also going to log here for admins reference that ticket #17497 was logged on the UTRS system today. Your request for an unblock has been denied and the ticket has now been closed.--5 albert square (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Grimm (season 6) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 01:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Morphdog. An edit that you recently made to New Girl (season 5) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Morphdog (t - c) 23:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Haven (season 5), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian? 00:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Continuing to edit war about article color schemes[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for Long term disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per this edit, which once again is trying to change an article color scheme through edit warring. You were blocked previously for trying to change article color schemes without any consensus for your changes. You are also continuing to edit with two identities, using this IP as well as S hannon434 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The multiple account evidence was given at this link. EdJohnston (talk) 04:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.106.151.168 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was going to use this wiki but the number is currently blocked for a year becaus of the sock puppeting. I have an upcoming study and would appreciate it if the account is unblocked so that I can finish my assignment. However, I'm worried that this account has a really bad reputation when it comes to connecting wifi with a certain number. BTW this a different person using it. 97.106.151.168 (talk) 15:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are clearly the same editor and this block will not be lifted. The standard offer instructions have been provided on your account talk page; that is your only option in order to be able to regain the trust of the community and return to editing in the future. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Ink Master (season 2), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:07, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bar Rescue (season 6) has been accepted[edit]

Bar Rescue (season 6), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Bar Rescue (season 6). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 04:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the middle of updating the page cause several eps already aired.97.106.151.168 (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Leviathan648, you aren't welcome here. Not until the block on your account is lifted. You know this already. Stop editing. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just telling the truth[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.106.151.168 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

To be honest, Levithan648 is still not on this usernumber nor its own userpage since I already checked the updates a couple days ago. He or she already dissapeared or retired for like a couple years now and has not edited wikipedia ever since.97.106.151.168 (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not believable. Talk page access revoked.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.