User talk:79.73.43.190

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2021[edit]

Hello, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edits on Dickie Pride have been reverted because they did not appear constructive. Make sure to read the Manual of Style (or the simplified version) before making edits. For example, the edit where you removed internal links was reverted because it is standard practice to provide links to lesser-known topics mentioned in the article. You may also want to create an account to hide your IP address. Again, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kate Fenton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Fenton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bay rum, you may be blocked from editing. Tacyarg (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Leverstock Green. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please would you now go to the main page for Lyn Harding and remove the " 'Disruptive' editing" from his main page, as it conyinues to purport, as you should say, that he lived there for ten years. I'll take a glance at his page in a few days to see if this high 'standard' is being equably applied: to all. You see, once implemented, inconvenient though it must be, questions arise in all minds about its selective implementationl it's only natural. Thank you Heath St John (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]