User talk:4meter4/Tools
| Source | Description | Main Subject? | Significant Coverage? | Policy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.rockngrowl.com/scardust-singer-noa-gruman-and-youtube-queen-patty-gurdy-talking-about-strangers-video-posted | Summary of an interview released by the band. Lacks independence. | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://metalmaximumradio.net/2020/12/01/scardust-release-break-the-ice-music-video/ | While this is supposedly a review, all of the critical assessments are quotes from other publications, and it reads like a promotional press release rather than a review. As such I question the independence and reliability of this article. | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://www.rockngrowl.com/scardust-announces-new-band-members | Press release announcement of new band members. Lacks independence | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://www.angrymetalguy.com/angry-metal-guys-top-15ish-of-2021/ | Self published blog; not reliable | Yes | No | Fails WP:Verifiability/ WP:SIGCOV |
| https://www.sonicperspectives.com/features/the-2020-favorite-progressive-metal-albums/ | Album review in a respectable ezine with reliable editorial oversight. This is a good source. (a note; academic journals and major established newspapers and magazines like The New Yorker and Time also take submissions and occasionally publish them after fact checking. The fact that this magazine allows bands to submit recordings for review doesn't mean this source lacks independence as they explicitly state policies that insure editorial oversight and independence, and are selective in what submissions they accept). | Yes | Yes | Passes WP:SIGCOV |
| http://www.progarchives.com/top-prog-albums.asp?syears=2020 | self-published fan archive; not clear that there is sufficient editorial oversight to be considered reliable | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:Verifiability |
| https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/music/scardust-premiere-epic-new-video-for-concrete-cages/ar-AAXHShw | Superficial promo piece that is mostly an interview; lacks independence as an interview | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://metalplanetmusic.com/2019/07/scardust-announce-july-shows-in-the-uk/ | Press release; lacks independence | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| http://www.themidlandsrocks.com/ramblin-man-fair-day-2-saturday-20th-july-2019/ | The publication itself is of questionable reliability as it publishes submissions from amateur writers as well as journalists with unclear editorial oversight. That said, this source only mentions the band in passing and it is not significant coverage. | No | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://www.loudersound.com/news/scardust-premiere-epic-new-video-for-concrete-cages | Press Release/ Interview; lacks independence | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://metalstorm.net/bands/band.php?band_id=13193 | Band bio page at metalstorm.net; database that anyone can edit; un-reliable | No | No | Fails WP:Verifiability and WP:SIGCOV |
| {https://www.spirit-of-metal.com/en/band/Somnia | Webzine profile; database listing with zero prose; does not address the band "directly and in-detail" | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV |
| https://totalrock.com/prog-metallers-scardust-announce-show-with-hurdy-gurdy-sensation-patty-gurdy/ | Promotional article with connection to ticket sales for the group; lacks independence as the publication has a financial conflict of interest | Yes | No | Fails WP:SIGCOV/WP:Verifiability |
| https://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Scardust/3540429071 | Encyclopedia Metallium entry; self-published website without a transparent editorial process; also can be edited by anyone and is not reliable; does not address the band in detail as there is zero prose | Yes | No | Fails WP:Verifiability and WP:SIGCOV |
| https://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Somnia/3540405193 | Encyclopedia Metallium page; can be edited by anyone with an account, so not reliable | Yes | No | Fails WP:Verifiability and WP:SIGCOV |
| http://www.metal-temple.com/site/catalogues/entry/worldwide_live_shows/double-feature-metal.htm | E-zine with unclear editorial process (website has no transparent editorial process described); questionable reliability | Yes | No | Fails WP:Verifiability and WP:SIGCOV |