User talk:2605:B40:13E7:F600:40FE:7B6D:17E8:D289

March 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at B.A.T. (G.I. Joe). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ultraman Tregear. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again...

I'm still convinced that you're not reading my summaries. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:40FE:7B6D:17E8:D289 (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ultraman Tregear, you may be blocked from editing. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 03:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ultraman Belial. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2605:B40:13E7:F600:40FE:7B6D:17E8:D289 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I assure you, I had benign intentions. The articles I redirected were completely based on primary sources, which you would know if you read my summaries. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:40FE:7B6D:17E8:D289 (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please show where you achieved consensus for your edits on the various article talk pages. Yamla (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Pppery and User:Zxcvbnm both agreed that some of my redirects were appropriate if that counts for anything. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:40FE:7B6D:17E8:D289 (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That you were/are correct is not the issue, for one can go about the right thing in the wrong way. The issue is edit-warring and disruptive editing. You need to convince admins you will change your approach, if you wish the block vacated. See WP:GAB and make a request that focuses on what you could have done better regardless of the mitigating circumstances. Regards! — Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Usedtobecool. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am just keeping you informed because you are mentioned there and you may get a better idea of what went wrong from what people say there. You should not edit that page or any other page including articles while you're blocked, even if you find yourself with an IP that's not blocked. Best, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.