User talk:203.89.173.247

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. {{helpme}}

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 203.89.173.247). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Antonrojo 22:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Matt Walker on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 23:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jonathan may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 23:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 23:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Keenan Pepper 04:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jack Pine[edit]

Your recent edit to Jack Pine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Femto 21:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Tenerife disaster. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --JFreeman (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


February 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Aquinas College, Tauranga, you will be blocked from editing. Ciaccona 23:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

March 2007[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to New Zealand has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 21:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Roman Empire, you will be blocked from editing. Pyrospirit Flames Fire 22:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Steve (Stephen) talk 22:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


May 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Frontier, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Curran (talk) 21:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Romani people (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Beauty, you will be blocked from editing. KJS77 02:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-gadfium 23:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tirau. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rgoodermote 22:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Regarding edits made during August 22 2007 (UTC) to New Zealand[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Helen Clarke. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tiptoety 00:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Helen Clarke, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 00:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Polar Bear, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — mæstrosync talk&contribs, 00:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block.[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. · AndonicO Talk 01:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October, 2007[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Eleanor Roosevelt, you will be blocked from editing. Again. JGHowes talk - 23:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tirau, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tirau was changed by 203.89.173.247 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-18T23:54:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 23:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tana Umaga. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tana Umaga was changed by 203.89.173.247 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-10-18T23:55:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 23:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Holmes (broadcaster), you will be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 00:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Helen Clark, you will be blocked from editing. --TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 00:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for an extended period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Your recent edit to Oi! (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Oi! constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat 22:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for another week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini hablame aqui 22:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Budai has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 20:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Henri Cartier-Bresson, you will be blocked from editing. скоморохъ 20:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Possum. Will (talk) 02:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. gadfium 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cruelty to animals has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Marlith (Talk)  01:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ian Stringfellow constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Benon (talk) 00:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electricity, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Electricity was changed by 203.89.173.247 (u) (t) deleting 10110 characters on 2008-06-09T00:20:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism from this address. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Rodhullandemu 00:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Laser diode has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Antonio Lopez (desu) 22:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ruby laser constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. SoWhy 22:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Periscope, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 22:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Periscope. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  – iridescent 22:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Binoculars (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 02:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Periscope. NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 02:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Binoculars (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. delldot ∇. 02:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jan Olbrycht has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --aktsu (t / c) 02:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Parallel computing. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 02:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Metamorphism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Metamorphism was changed by 203.89.173.247 (u) (t) deleting 7989 characters on 2009-10-14T02:10:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Green Bank Telescope. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dac04 (talk) 23:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gear, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gear was changed by 203.89.173.247 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-18T23:07:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Gear. December21st2012Freak chat 23:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 00:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Billy Elliot has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 01:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mohawk nation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  – Tommy2010 01:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Haitian Vodou, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Charles (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Metrosexual. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Matt Deres (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Narcotic has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Narcotic. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Narcotic. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — e. ripley\talk 03:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Battle of Aegospotami has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Quinxorin (talk) 23:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Midge. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Quinxorin (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 06:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dutch cuisine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dutch cuisine was changed by 203.89.173.247 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946359 on 2011-09-07T03:06:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Party pills, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Party pills was changed by 203.89.173.247 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954898 on 2011-09-20T21:40:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Party pills, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Baseball Watcher 21:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 23:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]