User:HitroMilanese/Archive17

Review draft:Fredokiss Hie Can you please review my article draft:Fredokiss thank you. Phalombe (talk) 00:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC) @Phalombe:, Hello there, Please see WP:MUSICBIO. Which of those 12 criteria does Fredokiss meet? Regards. Hitro talk 06:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) Help with draft:Garden Mart Hello I am not sure what you exactly mean in the review of the article that I've submitted. ' See WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the presented sources are WP:PRIMARY' If the submitter is not sure what the reviewer wants, it would be a good idea to discuss with the reviewer rather than just resubmitting (and annoying the reviewers). I thought it would be a good idea for me to get some advice from you because I don't want to waste the time of any reviewers. Link to my article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Garden_Mart#Garden_Mart_Department_Store @Aarav431: Hello there, The drafts related to companies and businesses must satisfy the notability guidelines at WP:NCOMPANY. The topic failing to satisfy these guidelines are not accepted at Wikipedia. Significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability. Most of the sources that are present in the Draft:Garden Mart are not independent of the subject such as those from Shikhar Organization. Other sources are not significant coverage. Passing mentions and routine coverage are not enough. WP:CORPDEPTH explains what sort of coverage are required to demonstrate notability. WP:PRIMARY explains what sorts of references are not accepted at Wikipedia. I hope it clarifies your doubt. Regards. Hitro talk 07:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC) Elmedin Ademi Helo, can you please help me ? Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, i cant understand these part. My article has been published from 2016 and how now is not a neutral point of view ? Your submission at Articles for creation: Elmedin Ademi (December 10) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katerina.josivoska (talk • contribs) 15:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC) @Katerina.josivoska:, Hello there, I can not comment on the deleted version of this article as I am not able to access the deleted content. But the current version of draft is not written in a neutral point of view i.e. it is promoting or praising the subject without giving encyclopedic info. Apart from that it is now tagged with copyvio speedy. I will suggest you to rewrite the content from the scratch and demonstrate notability per WP:GNG. You can check WP:YFA for more info on creating a fresh content. Regards. Hitro talk 06:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Want to discuss before resubmitting Hello there, Hope you are doing good. I have tried to add some new references in my draft. Please have a look and let me know if I can submit it for a review. Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mudasir_Zafar FilmIndia2020 14:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC) @FilmIndia2020:, Hello there, I reviewed the references but I still do not see the subject meeting WP:NACTOR. He is yet to have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Regards. Hitro talk 06:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Need help with a draft Hi Can you please review my article Draft:Yaacov_Heller https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yaacov_Heller thank youEKP1234 (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Eric @EKP1234:, Hello there, This draft has lots of references and it needs time to be reviewed, I will go through them when I get time. Regards. Hitro talk 07:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Thank you very much. I provided quite a few references as Yaacov has been a global artist for more than 45 years. I have been thorough and integrated as many as possible including the most recent documentary with Ben Ferencz. I look forward to your feedback. Eric EKP1234 (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC) @EKP1234:, Hello Eric, I reviewed all the references and I do not think that they are enough for establishing notability per WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. Significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources are essential. Catalogues, passing mentions and directory listings are not enough to demonstrate notability. Please see WP:THREE and point out top 3 sources on the talk page of the draft. Regards. Hitro talk 07:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Draft: Jessica Gethin Hi Hitro, thank you for your comments on fixing the referencing technique by going to WP: REFB. I am very new to Wiki and trying to sort this out. Will give it a go and hope to get the technique up to par.--Angela Ong (talk) 06:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC) @Angela Ong:, Hello there, the draft does not have properly formatted inline citation style which may give hard time to reviewers while verifying the claims. Please see Wikipedia:Inline citation. Please check this article, Zdravko Krivokapić, you may see that this article has 91 references in the reference section and each of them are properly formatted, accessible and navigable. Regards. Hitro talk 06:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Draft about Paysera Hello HitroMilanese, Please re-review my article Draft:Paysera. I have included a number of mentions in different reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frequency33 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC) @Frequency33:, Hello there, I still do not see that WP:CORPDEPTH is met. Press releases, routine coverage & passing mentions are not enough to establish notability per WP:NCOMPANY. However, I will leave this for another reviewer. A new set of eyes may have different opinion. Regards. Hitro talk 06:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Hi HitroMilanese, 20 references from 17 different, reliable sources, including an appearance at official webpages of Apple, Shopify, Central Bank as well as well-known fintech-focused media, like Finextra and The Fintech Times. How that possible not to be enough. Ok, the question does not necessarily require an answer but facts speak for themselves - articles in Wikipedia exist with much less coverage. For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easypaisa Frequency33 (talk) 09:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Draft: Feng Tang Hi, Hitro, sorry for my late update. Could you please help to review the draft: Feng Tang again.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Feng_Tang). I have made the updates according to your comments. Many thanks. @CherryChan2020:, Hello there, the presented sources are still unreliable. Please remove catalogue and shopping websites from references. Add reliable sources where his books have been reviewed or he has received significant coverage. Please submit the draft for review to take place. I do not think it will be accepted it its current form. Hitro talk 06:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC) Hi, Hitro, many thanks for your comments. I have revised and could you please go to take a look again. Thanks and wish you have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CherryChan2020 (talk • contribs) 08:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC) @CherryChan2020:, Hello there, I checked the draft and it appeared good in the first glance. Please submit and wait for the review. I will leave it for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk 06:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Hi, Hitro, Many many thanks for your help. I have re-submitted and hope it will be ok. ^.^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by CherryChan2020 (talk • contribs) 08:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Draft:LEViT∆TE (declined) hello HitroMilanese, thank you for your time. You recently declined a new wiki entry of mine. I would like to mention a couple of things, if you don't mind... please bare with me I am not too familiar with the messaging function here. The reasons for decline were that: 1. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO independently. 2. Listed Billboard charting is associated with Bassnectar. To address reason 1, This artist has: been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. (See references) To address reason 2: Yes, the billboard charting is associated with Bassnectar... However, this is because two the albums that charted, one of them being 'Unlimited', has a song co-created by the artist of this wiki, LEViT∆TE. If you read the top paragraph, LEViT∆TE collaborated with Bassnectar on two separate albums, both of which peaked at #1 on Billboard Electronic Music charts. The reference shows these albums and that they peaked #1. I also referenced a wiki entry of the 'Unlimited' album that shows LEViT∆TE in the track list. (I can add a reference to the second album that features a Bassnectar & LEViT∆TE song. Knowing this, does that make any difference? Or what would you suggest I change/delete/etc to improve chances of approval? Thanks for your insight, it is helping me create a better article. If I may, I would like to request that this not be deleted. I will make whatever changes necessary. Thank you! Theseth444 (talk) 07:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC) @Theseth444:, Hello there, your rationales related to Billboard charting is convincing to me. Please post three best sources here where the artist has received significant coverage. I am inclined towards accepting this. Regards. Hitro talk 14:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC) @HitroMilanese:, Thanks for your reply, Here are my three sources: [1] [2] [3] I know it can be difficult to know where interviews fall when it comes to sources so I just kept it to articles. This artist has also been mentioned on Rolling Stone and Billboard, however, I didn't include them here because he wasn't the main topic. I will also add another reference in the draft wiki for the Bassnectar collab project. Thanks again for your time, it is greatly appreciated! All the best. Theseth444 (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC) @Theseth444: Hello there, I will look into this later this week. There are some unreliable references in the draft such as Wikipedia and other catalogue listings, that needs to be removed. In the meantime, you may submit the draft and wait for review. Regards. Hitro talk 06:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Hello there, I checked the references and they appear good. Please submit the draft and wait for the review. Make sure to remove references from unreliable sources such as IMDb, Wikipedia and other music catalogue and listing sites. Regards. Hitro talk 06:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC) @HitroMilanese: Hello, I removed the references from unreliable sources and resubmitted the draft. Thank you so much for working with me! Theseth444 (talk) 08:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC) @HitroMilanese: Hello again, just a heads up, a different reviewer recently declined my re-submission before you had the chance to look at it for not showing significant coverage. I'm not sure they are aware that this artist has received significant coverage and that I have already proven so. I am not sure if I should re-submit again or if I should change something first, or what is required of me. I will wait for your response. Thanks so much for your time! Theseth444 (talk) 05:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC) @Theseth444:, Hello there, I will try to do some research on the references and fix this draft later this week. Regards. Hitro talk 07:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC) @HitroMilanese:, Thank you so much for your help! Let me know if you need anything from me. Theseth444 (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Draft:Passion's Price Hi, I added a better reference of an article for the "Passion's Price" page, so is the page acceptable now? I did the page because there is a "red link" for it (the 1st of the 3 albums listed on the Diva Destruction page says "Passion's Price" in red letters). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cp147 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC) @Cp147:, Hello there, I have fixed the article to some extent, removed unreliable sources and added inline citation. However, additional references are essential to demonstrate notability. Do you have references to more album reviews? If not then submit the draft for review and wait for review to take place. Regards. Hitro talk 07:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Hi, thanks and can you please help me pick a few of the best references out of these? Thanks. https://groundcast.com.br/09-discos-goticos-que-fazem-20-anos-em-2019/ Article Title: “9 Gothic disks that turn 20 in 2019” (English version) “Just like last year, I present to you a very nice list of gothic records from 1999. This year there are many great classics of the genre” “Each title has a link to Spotify, if you want to hear these excellent works.” “Diva Destruction -Passion’s Price” “Diva Destruction is one of my favorite gothic rock groups, especially for the well-made mix with electronic music and alternative rock.” https://www.wrappedinwire.com/D/DivaDestruction.htm http://www.erbadellastrega.it/divadestruction/ https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Gothic_Rock https://www.underground-empire.com/review.php?idx=798 http://almayarma.blogspot.com/2009/03/diva-destruction-passions-price.html https://www.gutsofdarkness.com/god/objet.php?objet=3295 http://old.gothic.ru/music/review/11-11-00_e.htm https://www.metal.de/news/diva-destruction-44908/ http://cementeriobibliografico.blogspot.com/2011/05/diva-destruction.html https://www.darkside.ru/album/7774/ https://www.versacrum.com/vs/2003/03/diva-destruction-exposing-the-sickness.html https://www.spirit-of-metal.com/fr/album/Passion_Price/9065 http://www.synthema.ru/2007/03/23/diva_destruction__passions_price_1999.html https://gothic.com.ua/Articles/1513.html https://www.amazon.com/Passions-Price-Diva-Destruction/dp/B00008I2CG https://www.last.fm/music/Diva+Destruction https://in-the-fog.ru/albums/15089-diva-destruction-passions-price-2001.html https://www.versacrum.com/vs/2003/04/diva-destruction.html http://hanksville.org/storytellers/VanCamp/writing/Sickness.html http://testicanzoni.mtv.it/testi-Diva-Destruction_19244/Passion's-Price-album_10301736 https://entertheshadows.com.br/artist/Diva+Destruction — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cp147 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC) @Cp147: Hello there, Thank you for the sources. I will look into this later this week. Regards. Hitro talk 07:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Hello there, references from Wikiwand,, Blogspot, Amazon, Last FM and album catalogue sites are not considered reliable. I don't see direct review of the album Passion's Price. However, you may add other eligible references to the draft and submit it for the review. Regards. Hitro talk 07:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Ashvin Gidvani Hi, Can you please let me know where you want me to cite the article? As I have placed all the verified link in reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedigitalcafe (talk • contribs) 06:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC) @Thedigitalcafe: Please see WP:Inline citation. You should place references inline at the end of sentences for proper citation. Regards. Hitro talk 06:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC) User:Thereckonmusic Hey i got verified in my country and it's not conflicting any materials.If you don't want to accept me,it's okay. I will talk to Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thereckonmusic (talk • contribs) 08:12, 20 December 2020 (UTC) @Thereckonmusic: Hello there, the topics related to musicians must meet WP:MUSICBIO for inclusion. The sources that you have listed in the draft are not reliable and they are not enough to demonstrate notability. Regards. Hitro talk 07:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Request on 08:21:35, 23 December 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Gustav Addnode Gustav Addnode (talk · contribs) Draft:Addnode Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Hi, Thanks for reviewing the Addnode article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Addnode_Group. Unfortunately, it did not get accepted due to independent/reliable sources and notability. I have now updated the page, and used secondary articles and equity research website (Redeye), as well as the annual report published through the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority - which should be considered reliable? As for the notability - yes the company is not as notable as Apple or Microsoft, but it is a public company employing around 1,600 people in europe. If it is still not meeting the standards, could you specify what needs to be changed? Happy holidays! Gustav Addnode (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC) @Gustav Addnode:, Hello there, thank you for updating the references. Presented references are definitely independent but I am not sure about reliability. I will leave this for another reviewer. Happy Holidays!!!! Hitro talk 07:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Article Review Hello Hitro, I did make changes draft and added more citations as you did suggest me before. please review the submission and let me know how can I improve the quality of the article. Draft Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aashu_Patel Hello there, thank you for your contribution. As mentioned by the previous reviewer, please identify WP:THREE of the best sources on the talk page of the draft. Regards. Hitro talk 06:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Hello there, I go through all the article mentioned on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RoySmith/Three_best_sources I did find the below-listed source competing with retirement mentioned on those pages. Also, it's meeting personal biography guidelines. Please do check it once and let me know if I missing something here. http://microsarjan.in/2019/08/15/interview/ https://sursamvaad.net.au/aashu-patel/ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Tigmanshu-Dhulia-will-helm-a-film-based-on-Aashu-Patels-novel-Madam-X/articleshow/46930026.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgoju (talk • contribs) 16:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Regarding the decline of submission what exactly will be considered as reliable in term of business terms? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neeku oj (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC) @Neeku oj:, Hello there, please see WP:RS & WP:NCOMPANY. You may also want to see the list of reliable & unreliable sources at WP:RSPSOURCES. Regards. Hitro talk 06:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Regarding my draft article not coming under notability I have created draft article Draft:FC Kolhapur City You have reviewed it and declined it because it doesn't come under notability but I know that it played in Indian Women's League which comes under notability of Indian football club's so please check again and approve it. Thanks ~~Shivsa008 Shivsa008 (talk) 03:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC) @Shivsa008:, Hello there, please see WP:GNG and introduce additional references in independent and reliable sources to demonstrate notability. I do agree that the club may be notable but as a draft creator you are required to show notability. See WP:BURDEN. Apart from that, you may want to see WP:REFB for understanding the syntax for proper inline citation. Regards. Hitro talk 06:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Article declined! Hello! I have created an biograpgypage of mine but every thing which i entered in my article is Real as i am a influencer currently i am having more than 7.9k followers on instagram but I also have 1M+ profile engagement which proved me that i am real. Sir please try to publish my biography in google. Thankyou regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishaan 2460 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC) Draft:Oluwaseyi Olufemi Emmanuel Submission declined! Hello @HitroMilanese:, you dropped a comment saying this article does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO. Do you mean that if this subject has at least one of these criteria, the submission would be accepted? Trendrives (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC) @Trendrives:, Hello there, Yes, I meant exactly that. Regards. Hitro talk 06:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Draft:Shilbhadra Dutta I have provided resources now. Please review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TTP1233 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Help with draft for 'Burpple' article Hello! Thanks for reviewing my new article submission on 4 December 2020. I have revised the article for a more neutral stance and resubmitted the article. Hope to get your kind feedback on this :-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Burpple — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grimlay (talk • contribs) 02:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC) @Grimlay:, Hello there, I still believe that additional references are required to demonstrate notability per WP:NCOMPANY. Anyhow, I will leave this for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk 06:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Draft:Synthetic Soul Hello Hitro! A little late with this, but THANK YOU for reviewing and accepting my AfC submission for Stacy Barthe's debut album, BEcoming. I'm genuinely grateful and pleased to be contributing to Wikipedia's music coverage. If/when you have some time, could you please review my latest AfC submission for Chiiild's debut EP, Synthetic Soul? To assist you, I believe it should meet WP:NALBUM on the basis of: • Subject of multiple, reliable sources—e.g., magazines (The Line of Best Fit, COMPLEX, Paste, Exclaim!), radio (Vocalo Radio, Beats 1), podcasts (The Joe Budden Podcast), and multiple year-end lists (Time Out, Cult MTL). • Has appeared on national music charts—e.g., USA (NACC Top 200 Radio Chart), Canada (CJRU.ca Top 30 Radio Chart), and Australia (the EP's 4th single, "Hands Off Me," is currently shortlisted on Triple J's Hottest 100). Thank you in advance for reviewing my request, Hitro. A belated Happy New Year and kind regards! — VVARO talk  20:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Dr. Michael J. Lenardo, M.D. Hi Hitro, Thank you for reviewing my draft about Dr. Michael Lenardo and your contribution. I am a new contributor to Wikipedia, and wanted to ask if there is anything I should do to help complete the review process. Thanks again and take care, Heather — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hecamo (talk • contribs) 02:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC) @Hecamo:, Hello Heather, thank you for your contribution. Your draft appears all good, just wait for the review to take place. Regards. Hitro talk 06:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Alessandro Avataneo's Page Dear HitroMilanese, I'm Viola, the author of the page about Alessandro Avataneo (here the draft link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alessandro_Avataneo). Thank you for the review and your suggestions. I've added some references. I hope they will be enough. I'm available for any changes. Thanks for your time. Viola Capriola — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.32.239.186 (talk) 18:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Hello Viola, thank you for your contribution. I see that you have made changes and submitted the draft for review. I will leave this draft for another reviewer. Just wait for review to take place. Regards. Hitro talk 07:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Charlie Burt Page Hello HitroMilanese, I am trying to build this page for Mr. Burt and am slowly adding more and more information. I have added several links to other sources other than direct interviews. Please work be kind during this process, I have not made one of these pages before. Thank you. ECP2016 (talk) 07:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Help on notability Hi HitroMilanese You have reviewed my article for Humanists Australia and rejected it for not being notable. The reason I felt the need to create the article is because Humanists Australia has been confused with the Council of Australian Humanist Societies (CAHS) by people searching for humanism in Australia, and especially by Google Search itself. If you google Humanists Australia the top two entries are associated with CAHS and the knowledge box that Google gleans from Wikipedia is a confusing mix of the Humanists Australia website and information from the wikipedia entry for CAHS. CAHS is historically important, but the future of Humanism in Australia lies with Humanists Australia. The Australian Humanist Societies that CAHS is the umbrella body for have been dwindling in number as you'll see by the edit history of the CAHS entry. For balance and to avoid confusion, if CAHS has an article, Humanists Australia needs one too. I have declared a conflict of interest here but I have tried to be impartial. I am a former President of CAHS in addition to being the Acting Chair of Humanists Australia. Is there anything I can do to prove the notability of Humanists Australia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magenta-meerkat (talk • contribs) 07:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC) @Magenta-meerkat:, Hello there, I suggest you to see WP:ORGCRITE. An organization is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Your draft is largely sourced to the subject's official website which is not enough to demonstrate notability. Please add references from independent and reliable sources then submit the draft for review. Regards. Hitro talk 07:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Draft:PlanetarySystemStacker Hello HitroMilanese I learned that you are one of the reviewers for new articles in en-Wikipedia. It seems that you have all prerequisites: you like to support newcomers (I am a newcomer at EN, not DE), talk German, have an interest in astronomy and programming, hopefully image processing as well. Would you please have a look at the draft page PSS? What did I overlook which might not be of interest to amateur astronomers and would justify to have a only? Thanks for help! Tubas (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC) @Tubas:, Hello Tubas, thank you for your contribution. I just checked the mentioned draft. At Wikipedia, drafts are accepted on the basis of notability. Notability is determined with help of references. WP:GNG explains the exact criteria of inclusion. You are required to introduce additional references in independent and reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Out of 7 presented source, 4 are authored by Rolf Hampel who is the developer of this software. Such references are primary (See WP:PSTS). One of the references is an interview, which again is not considered reliable. Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources. Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if that has been published by a reliable secondary source. See WP:SECONDARY. I hope these info have been useful. Regards. Hitro talk 06:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC) I may send you a pdf-copy of the article Paul Hombach "Scharfe Mond- und Planetenbilder mit dem Planetarysystemstacker" 12/2020 [4]. I am not allowed to publish it here. But under the link you find the article mentioned in the index. If this is not sufficient how many publications are required for acceptance in en-Wikipedia? Tubas (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC) How to improve wiki page What was the mistake in wiki page please suggest change. Royalsalanit (talk) 07:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Hive I think it is a pity that you removed my new article on the bookseller Hive. Hive, a subsidiary of a British book wholesaler, has been going for quite a few years now, and has been the only significant competitor to Amazon in the UK online bookseller market. There's been quite a lot of publicity in recent weeks for a new online bookseller in the UK, which looks at first sight to be another new British bookseller. It is, however, in fact an American one with a new British subsidiary. Because of the economic and population strength of the United States, Wikipedia tends to be rather dominated by American input, and it seems to be unfair in various ways for Wikipedia to be confined only to American booksellers selling online in United Kingdom, when there is a perfectly good domestic competitor. I have other things to do with my life then to write articles for you to delete, so I will not be doing anything further about it, but I feel that you should reflect more carefully before taking actions of this kind. I should add that I have no economic interest in or other connection of any kind with Hive or its owners. Deipnosophista (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC) 1008 water Hi, what need to be added to improve the draft to prepare to post. Thanks. Mig617 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mig617 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC) @Mig617: Please see WP:ORGCRITE. Your draft must fulfill these listed criteria for acceptance. Regards. Hitro talk 09:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Finding a reliable source Hey HitroMilanese! My page submission was declined by you, and I would like to get some help. You left the message that all of the sources are unreliable. I used a source from the Hungarian National Press Service, does that also count as unreliable? There isn't much publicly available about the topic, how could I get the page to be published with the sources that are available? How can I convert the existing text to be usable with the existing sources? Is it possible to add "According to" or by using phrasing like that? --Kazo lev (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC) @Kazo lev: Hello there, Please note that notability is determined at Wikipedia on the basis of presented sources. If a topic has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. References from Twitter, self published website, or other non-reliable entities are not enough to establish notability. About Hungarian National Press Service (Magyar Távirati Iroda), you may notice the publisher of that article is Junior Achievement Magyarország who are closely associated with the subject of the draft. This makes this source primary or to some extent unreliable. I hope I clarified everything. Regards. Hitro talk 07:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Hello Hi can you give me amy tips on editing my page Kipblackston (talk) 07:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC) @Kipblackston:, Hello there, as mentioned in my reviewing comment, please see WP:MUSICBIO. Drafts at Wikipedia are accepted only when the topic meets certain notability guidelines. WP:MUSICBIO is the notability guidelines related to musicians and singers. If the subject of your draft meets any of these criteria of inclusion then please demonstrate it at your draft and verify those claims with help of references from independent and reliable sources. Regards. Hitro talk 08:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Draft:Angry Prash He is a very popular internet personality, entertainer and influencer. He has millions of followers in India! Please try to understand. Many people try to find information about him. Also articles like this already exists on Wikipedia like articles about Indian YouTubers e.g. Dhruv rathee, Carryminati, Gaurav chaudhry etc. HeroNumberZero (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC) @HeroNumberZero:, Hello there, popularity and notability are two different things. Popularity may be temporary but notability is permanent. Drafts at Wikipedia are accepted only when the topic is deemed notable as per the guidelines. It does not matter how popular the subject is. Please see and WP:ENT and WP:GNG and try to demonstrate notability as per these guidelines. Also see WP:NPOV and use formal encyclopedic tone while creating the draft. Unless notability is determined as per the set guidelines, the draft will not be accepted. Regards. Hitro talk 08:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Draft:Miracle Band Is that the subject is not accepted, no matter how i edit it, it cant pass? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry wu0920 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC) @Larry wu0920:, Hello there, first of all, do not remove decline notices or comments from the draft. Secondly, please see WP:BAND and demonstrate notability as per the guidelines before resubmitting. If you keep on submitting the draft without making any improvement then the draft will be rejected & deleted. Regards. Hitro talk 09:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Article D.j. Mirko B. Hi ! I wrote the article on this Italian producer and deejay that according to him deserves a lot. but it is constantly being eliminated. as his is eliminated there would be many others to eliminate. However Wikipedia 'The free encyclopedia' is not a FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA, as there are reviewers who block your freedom of writing, which when an encyclopedia is "free" shouldn't even exist. So I highly recommend Wikipedia to change its name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durex223 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC) @Durex223:, Hello there, I am not going to indulge myself in the debate over "Free Encyclopedia" but I can suggest you with the ways to improve the draft that you have created. At Wikipedia, drafts are accepted when the subject meets the criteria of inclusion such as WP:GNG. There are multiple profession specific notability guidelines and DJ Mirko falls under WP:NMUSICIAN. You are required to demonstrate notability as per these guidelines. References from reliable sources help in establishing notability. If you are able to show that the topic meets any of the notability guideline then I will be glad to accept this draft. Regards. Hitro talk 07:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)