User:Cassie Schebel

About

You will most likely find me making small fixes like grammar and citations, and occasionally on talk pages asking questions about how things should be done. I'm still a student in high school, so I don't think my writing skill is sufficient to add a bunch of content here. <3

If I forget to label one of my edits as a minor edit, you have permission to slap me with a wet trout.

Missing commas are my arch-enemy!

Too many Userboxes This user writes poetry. This user writes plays. This user writes short stories. ,This user's favorite punctuation is commas, guys, not exclamation points or whatever. This user thinks, therefore she exists. This editor is a WikiGnome. This user believes that just because abortion is immoral, that doesn't mean it should be illegal (just like adultery, divorce, and war). This user emits an undisclosed amount of ionizing radiation per second. This user is from Eris. This user is a lesbian. This user is transgender. This user is a woman. Main page deletedThis user wishes to become an admin to delete the main page. This user supports autism acceptance, not awareness. This user is a participant in WikiProject Autism. This user is autistic. This user is a transgender lesbian. This user likes crows. This user likes to use eyeliner. This user is a Mermaid. This user has survived cancer for 11 years, 8 months, and 9 days. 1/3 = 0.4This user likes Dozenal. Everybody's got something to hide except for this user and his/her monkey (I'm not too sure about him). 23This user is a 23rdian; she sees the number 23 everywhere. ;This user is addicted to semicolons; she uses them frequently. la-3Haec ustrix callidissima latinitate contribuere potest. 17This user is 6,542 days old. This user ardently opposes the alt-right. INFPThis user has an INFP Myers–Briggs Type Indicator This user reserves the right to question authority. This user thinks that stock exchange is immoral. Separate is not equal! This user supports unisex public toilets.

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.