Template talk:Infobox motor racing team

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles

Motorsport NA‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
NA	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Usage[edit]

You can see this infobox in use at ART Grand Prix. Other motorsport templates are listed at WikiProject Motorsport.

Issue when "Folded" field is not filled in[edit]

See the following article as an example: Joest Racing

It appears that when you don't fill in that the team has folded it puts a random bold "Folded" at the very top of the article.Sabre ball (talk) 15:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue when Drivers section is missing[edit]

When the "drivers" section is not present it causes {{{drivers}}} to appear in the infobox. This can be corrected by filling "|drivers = " in the infobox on the page, but this causes an empty section to appear. I think it would be better to fix in the template instead. An example can be found here: Fortec Motorsport. --Sabre ball^{t c} 19:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue when Drivers section is missing (again)[edit]

This issue is back again. I'm not sure which changed has reverted the previous fix. For example, try Krohn Racing. Remove the empty drivers section and preview the page. --Sabre ball^{t c} 18:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On second though, looking at the revison log, maybe it was never fixed. I'm not sure now. --Sabre ball^{t c} 18:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]