Template talk:Did you know/Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic

Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that Canadian artist Jana Sterbak's controversial "Vanitas: Flesh Dress for an Albino Anorectic" (1987) included a dress made of meat, easily pre-dating Lady Gaga's 2010 meat dress?

Reviewed: Miracle Man (The X-Files) ([1])

Created by Zanimum (talk). Self nom at 22:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules – size ok (181)
Source –
Interest – I have suggested a more succinct ALT. Original is okay too.Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable –
ALT hooks, if proposed –

... that Jana Sterbak created a dress made of meat, 23 years before Lady Gaga wore one?

The alt seems to get the the meat of the situation, in a much hookier fashion. (Puns intended) Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, with the very slight additions I made. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Length – --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage – --Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) – Bare URLs are generally not for the main page. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality – Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing – Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio (files) – FUR available. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting – Looks okay. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a copyedit and some microparagraphs should be merged. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion:

The hook is not sourced at all.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's now sourced, now that I see this issue. -- Zanimum (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is source num 17 some kind of blog?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]