Template:Did you know nominations/Simone Gold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Simone Gold

Simone Gold
Simone Gold

Created by Kmburke5 (talk) and Rp2006 (talk). Nominated by AllegedlyHuman (talk) at 03:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - I am concerned that the hook may "focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals", as discouraged by WP:DYKHOOK. The hook is basically a list of three negative aspects of a living individual. I'm also concerned that the phrase "hydroxychloroquine advocate" may be misleading out of context – the WHO is also a hydroxychloroquine advocate in that they recommend hydroxychloroquine for treating malaria, but I suppose the point here is that Simone Gold advocates it for treating COVID-19. Could we try an alt hook or two?
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: In addition to the points above, the article is somewhat negative in tone. If that's a reflection of reliable sources, then fair enough, but I would suggest at least making some adjustments based on WP:CSECTION and WP:CLAIM. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC) updated 16:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I've edited the article per your comments. On the point about the hook being negative: I agree that you or I may find Gold's actions objectionable, but for her, it's how she's chosen to live her life. For someone who genuinely seems to believe that vaccines don't work, that hydroxychloroquine cures COVID, and that Trump won the election, I doubt she would see these facts as negative at all. However, I have added alternative blurbs to the nomination for you to take a look at. Thank you. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the changes, and it's a good point that what seems negative to me may not be negative from Gold's point of view. ALT1 doesn't quite seem to be supported by the source, which says that Trump shared a video from the organization but not that Gold helped convince him. ALT0 or ALT2 is probably fine, though I remain concerned that "hydroxychloroquine advocate" may be misleading in ALT0. My preference would be something like
Granger (talk · contribs) 07:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I've removed the reference to hydroxychloroquine from the first blurb. I would support that or the blurb you've proposed. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, the new version of the original blurb (ALT0) is my favorite of the bunch. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Came by to promote, need clarification on which ALTs have been approved. AllegedlyHuman Mx. Granger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valereee (talkcontribs) 18:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Valereee: ALT0, ALT2, and ALT3 are approved. My preference is ALT0. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)