The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Overall: @Theleekycauldron: Good article! Article is sourced, hooks are interesting, and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke: would you mind confirming that the article meets guidelines one more time? I've made a significant number of edits since your review and wouldn't want to burden the promoter with re-checking. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Article still seems to be fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)