Template:Did you know nominations/Non-aqueous phase liquid

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 16:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Non-aqueous phase liquid

(

)

... that non-aqueous phase liquid contaminants can slowly dissolve into aquifers over time? Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128222522000037
- Reviewed:
- Comment: The article was increased five-fold more than seven days ago, on November 21 2023. The article was expanded from 125 words to roughly 2300! It's a new, low-traffic article that still deserves consideration.

5x expanded by Knowledgengine (talk). Self-nominated at 21:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Non-aqueous phase liquid; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

That's a really impressive expansion! Thanks for your work. Unfortuntately, the expansion needs to happen in the seven days before a DYK nomination. Here, there were over three weeks between expansion and nomination, so it's not eligible. There is another route to a DYK: via a WP:good article nomination (GA). In the seven days after an article is promoted to a good article, you can also nominate it for DYK. The article seems very close to meeting the requirements for a good article, which is impressive for a new user. I've copy-edited the article lightly, and I think you can nominate it as-is. The most likely comment from a GA reviewer will be to make the article a bit easier to understand. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)