Template:Did you know nominations/Milli Fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Milli Fire[edit]

Milli Fire air drop
Milli Fire air drop
Milli Fire
Milli Fire
Milli Fire smoke
Milli Fire smoke

Source: On 28 September, a Bend Bulletin article reported the Milli Fire had burned 24,079 acres (97.44 km2). Most of the sources mention the fire being in the Three Sisters Wilderness. Here’s an example from a Bend Bulletin article dated 22 Aug 2017: “The Milli Fire near Sisters is burning westward in the Three Sisters Wilderness … the Milli Fire was most active on the north side of Black Crater and was observed burning downhill near Lava Lake camp and North Matthieu Lake, all in the Three Sisters Wilderness.”

Created by Orygun (talk). Self-nominated at 02:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC).

  • Hook looks good, I have bolded it as per norm. I have to say I am not sure the image used is the most appropriate. I would prefer the image used in the infobox or this image. The article is long enough and well-sourced, as well as being new enough. I'm not satisfied with the image sourcing, links should be provided to the individual image and not the gallery. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Added the two recommended images above for comparison; also as recommended, changed image sources to reference individual on-line images vice using Forest Service photo image page.--Orygun (talk) 06:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for improving the image sourcing. I prefer the third image, but I see no problems with using either the second or third image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Jon Kolbert: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. So far you have covered newness, length, and sourcing. Please also indicate whether the article meets inline hook cite, neutrality, and close paraphrasing criteria. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Hook is 156 characters in length, has in-line citation and is neutral. No close paraphrasing concerns, only matches are proper names. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Restoring your tick. Yoninah (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)