Template:Did you know nominations/History of Medicine Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 16:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

History of Medicine Society[edit]

  • ... that the History of Medicine Society of the Royal Society of Medicine, was founded by Sir William Osler in 1912, who considered this as one of his greatest lifetime achievements? Source: Hunting, Penelope (2002). The History of The Royal Society of Medicine. Royal Society of Medicine Press. p. 330. ISBN 1853154970. 4 years before his death , Sir William Osler put it on record...'I have done 3 useful things, or better, helped to ...3. the historical section of the Roy. Soc. of Medicine'
    • ALT1:... that the History of Medicine Society symposium on 'The history of medicine and tomorrows doctors' in 1997, was to support the GMC's 1993 'Tomorrows Doctors' publication, which favoured broader undergraduate learning? Source:Hunting, Penelope (2002). The History of The Royal Society of Medicine. Royal Society of Medicine Press. p. 333. ISBN 1853154970

Created/expanded by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 07:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC).

  • Do the hooks properly please - see how other do it, or the rules. The 2nd is surely too long, and the first rather banal. Johnbod (talk) 02:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Johnbod: Thank you for putting in right direction.Is it OK now?Whispyhistory (talk) 06:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Tweaked. Ok now. I'm not reviewing btw. Johnbod (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • the article is long enough, is neutral, contains no close paraphrasing or copyvio (only names/positions that cannot be changed), the hook is neutral (I like ALT0 the best), short enough, interesting, is properly sourced with an inline source citation, that the article itself is adequately sourced and written in adequate English (a little too much short sentences and I placed the galleries at the end to make it easier to read). I suggest also:
@Johnbod: You may not be reviewing this, and in fact Elisa.rolle has done that, but perhaps you could formally approve the ALT2 hook so that this nomination can move forward. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't see why this is needed at all, but ALT2 looks ok. Johnbod (talk) 12:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)