Template:Did you know nominations/Ecological-evolutionary theory
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Fredlyfish4 (talk) 01:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ecological-evolutionary theory[edit]
- ... that ecological-evolutionary theory posits that level of technology is the prime determinant in whether societies flourish or perish?
- Reviewed: Harta Berdarah
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 11:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC).
- This is a new article created on May 13 with adequate length and well referenced with inline citations, and QPQ is good. The last link in the external links was not found. Is there any better way to say "prime determinants" or "posits"? It just seems a little wordy, but good nonetheless. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Stipulates... key factor? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that ecological-evolutionary theory posits that level of technology is the key factor in whether societies flourish or perish?
For ALT1. I think key factor works better than prime determinant. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
