Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Steven Koecher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Amakuru (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Disappearance of Steven Koecher

  • Reviewed: Robert Burns (Stevenson)
  • Comment: I would like this to run on December 13, the ten-year anniversary of the disappearance, as the hooks suggest.

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 21:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT0 is very hooky, verified and cited inline. Image is fair use. QPQ done.
  • My only issue with the article is the amount of space you gave to Steven Powell's "theory". You are giving too much weight to the words of a convicted felon, who in my opinion was trying to deflect attention away from his son's involvement in Susan's disappearance and possible murder. Everything after the third paragraph can pretty much be deleted. Yoninah (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
@Yoninah: OK, I had had some doubts about that myself, so I tightened it up and removed the specifics (although to be fair, Steven Powell was not a convicted felon at the time he wrote that letter).

However, should some future reliable source discuss this theory at length, I think whatever level of detail it is discussed to could be restored. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Thank you. ALT0 good to go for December 13. Yoninah (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)