Template:Did you know nominations/ChickClick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

ChickClick

  • ... that American website ChickClick was owned by the same company who owned IGN? Source: IGN (article): "Imagine started the female-centric Chick Click site (whose offices were quickly moved away from those of the IGN editors for reasons too numerous to mention)."
    • ALT1:... that American website ChickClick also had a free e-mail and web hosting known as Chickmail and Chickpages? Source: Adweek (article): "Those include free Internet server space for members to build their own homepages (which the company calls Chickpages and Estropages) and free e-mail accounts (called Chickmail and Estromail)."
    • ALT2:... that American website ChickClick was once run by three people? Source: SF Gate (article): "Even now, we only have a staff of three people!"
    • ALT3:... that ChickClick was run by a graduate student from Stanford University and her younger sister? Source: SF Gate (article): Swanson is joined in running Chickclick by her sister Heather who, at 22, is, like Heidi, becoming a new media star in her own right... "I was in the middle of Stanford MBAs," she shrugs. "I just didn't fit in."

Created by Lullabying (talk). Self-nominated at 23:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC).

Happy to take this on. Okay, let's get this show on the road!

  • New - Article created on July 10th and nominated on July 11th, within 7 days of its creation. (TICK)
  • Long enough - prose text is 5377 characters, above 1500 threshold. (TICK)
  • Within policy - is neutral - prose does not contain peacock terms, and uses fact-of-the-matter language to portray information. (TICK) :*Critical reception section is balanced. (TICK)
  • Within policy - cites sources with inline citations - article has 21 properly-sourced citations. (TICK)
  • Within policy - is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism - Earwig's Copyvio Detector report showed "Violation Unlikely 9.1% similarity". (TICK)
  • I recommend Hook 0,
  • Hook 0 Format - all hooks are below 200 words.(TICK)
  • Hook 0 Content - interesting to a broad audience - tying the subject of this article to a well-known company with a different brand. (TICK)
  • Hook 0 Content - hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article - Hook is supported by an article by IGN itself so super reliable, which nominator linked to above. I have verified the source myself. (TICK)
  • Hook 0 Content - neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people - Hook is writted neutrally. (TICK)
  • Other - QPQ – nominator reviewed Survivalcraft, which has since been promoted to DYK. (TICK)
  • Other - Image - N/A (TICK)
I'm happy to support this nomination! :) --Coin945 (talk) 06:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)