Template:Did you know nominations/Charles W. Crawford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Charles W. Crawford[edit]

  • Comment: Not a self-nomination

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 15:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC).

  • The article is long enough and nominated within 7 days of its creation. There is inline citations for every paragraph of the body with no indication of copyright violations. There is no need for QPQ since this is not a self-nomination. The hook is not too long and interesting, but there is no citation after the sentence, which is the basis for the hook. If there is a source for the hook, then assuming good faith, it would be good to go. I am One of Many (talk) 03:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Source was The London Philatelist. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)