Template:Did you know nominations/Brigitte Boehme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sst 07:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Promoted with image

Brigitte Boehme[edit]

Brigitte Boehme
Brigitte Boehme

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 13:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, nominated day of creation. Long enough, as 1900+ exceeds 1500 last time I checked. The article is written in a neutral manner, and each paragraph features inline citations. I don't claim my German is good enough to perfectly check for close paraphrasing, but none was noted and the structure of the article did not match the structure of any particular source. The hook meets all formatting guidelines, and does present information in a factual manner. It is directly attributable to an inline citation given directly after the statement. I found it very interesting, if you pay attention it is "hookier" than average. QPQ complete. The image renders decently at small size, and its free-use has been confirmed. This is ready for mainspace exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Her date of birth needs an inline citation as it is the basis of her age in the hook. Jolly Ω Janner 21:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I took it from the German Wikipedia which has no source. What can we do? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • It's there. The 2013 article gives her age as 72, which means she was born in very late 1940 or 1941. In any case she would have been 41 or 42 years old at her 1982 baptism, which matches "in her forties" as found in the hook. Hook remains directly attributable to cited source. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I added that source to the article. I'm now happy to promote this. Jolly Ω Janner 21:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

() Jolly Janner, I have no idea if this is ready to go or not. Please always use one of the two tick icons if you're saying that a hook is ready to be moved to prep, otherwise the nomination is going to be passed over because the set builders are looking for those icons. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

I was looking to promote it before I added my initial query and was then considering promoting it myself. I then felt I may have become too involved to promote it myself. Sorry for the confusion. Jolly Ω Janner 02:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Restoring the from Jolly Janner review, in light of the clarification above. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)