Template:Did you know nominations/Austropaxillus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 17:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Austropaxillus, Austropaxillus infundibuliformis[edit]

Austropaxillus infundibuliformis, Bunyip State Forest, Victoria

5x expanded by Casliber (talk), Sasata (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC).

  • Indeed 5x expanded. Image fine, new enough, long enough, and no copyright violations. However, Hook is not directly cited. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Yeah well, but rules are rules. Still... It has yet to be directly cited. (You cited the following sentence, which is not the hook) ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 05:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I've duplicated the citation. Sasata (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I added Austropaxillus infundibuliformis to the nom to make it a double-hook. Sasata (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Actually, Bonkers, if you could hold off a day from completing this review, I think we could expand dry rot as well to make this a triple hook; I'll ping you when this is finished – thanks for your patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasata (talkcontribs) 20:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Sure thing, I'm waiting. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 04:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok, it's ready to be checked. Note I've changed the hook to describe genus Serpula as "brown rot" rather than the more specific "dry rot" (a form of brown rot), which is applicable to only 1 species in the genus. Sasata (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)