Template:Did you know nominations/Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center in 2016

• ... that the architect of the Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center (pictured) thought of stacked nagaya houses while designing it? Source: https://www.interactiongreen.com/asakusa-cultural-tourism-center-kengo-kuma/
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: QPQ is unneeded as this is only my third nom.

Created by DarkNight0917 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Reviewing this nom as per QPQ rules. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: It's concerning that there some references are not reliable. These are refs #7 (Tokyo Tourist Information) and #15 (Asakusa Station). If other references can be used to replace this, aside from a better hook, then we can proceed. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC) All good now. Howard the Duck (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: I have addressed the referencing issues and removed the problematic sources. For the hooks, I came up with a few other options:

• ... that because the Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center's floors were slanted, extra equipment could be stored in the extra space? Source: https://www.interactiongreen.com/asakusa-cultural-tourism-center-kengo-kuma/ (Note - unsure where the (pictured) tag would go here)
• ... that the Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center's floors are slanted? Source: https://www.interactiongreen.com/asakusa-cultural-tourism-center-kengo-kuma/ (note: same as above)
• ... that the architect of the Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center (pictured) wanted the building to show asymmetry from all persepctives? Source: https://www.interactiongreen.com/asakusa-cultural-tourism-center-kengo-kuma/

Hope this helps. - DarkNight0917 | (t/c) 05:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I'd prefer the third suggestion.

Upon checking, there are still a couple of problematic refs, this time from Japan Travel (refs #7 and #18). I suppose facts like what the motto of the building is and that you can buy refreshments there is rather mundane, but the center offering maps and brochures in other languages rather than Japanese seems important, as it gives the impression that the center also caters to foreign tourists and not just domestic ones. If that can be replaced, this is good to go. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: Okay, we'll go with the third suggestion then. I have replaced the Japan Travel sources. - DarkNight0917 | (t/c) 00:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

All good now. Howard the Duck (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

• Due to concerns raised at WT:DYK#Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center (nom) this nomination has been reopened while awaiting a re-review. Courtesy pings to Schwede66 and Launchballer, as well as the original reviewer Howard the Duck. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

I've changed the wording of the sentence in question, added an inline, and corrected a few more errors. - DarkNight0917 | (t/c) 22:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay. ALT0 approved.--Launchballer 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

This has been sitting at the top of the 'Approved' pile for a while now. What's the hold up?--Launchballer 11:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)