Template:Did you know nominations/Agastachys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri[edit]

Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Wriekhathaar (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Summary:
  • 1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation
  • 2nd: expansion, 361*5=1801 needed, at 1836; source says it's present, but not explicitly endemic to Tasmania
  • 3rd: expansion, 50*5=1500 needed, now at 1646; same issue as #2.

Does the Flora of Australia Online website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... Sasata (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, Banksia dentata extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hence for Persoonia gunnii and Persoonia muelleri, it lists their whole range - which is wholly in tasmania (and nowhere else) Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Ok, ready to go now. Sasata (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)