Template:Did you know nominations/A History of Medicine (book)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

A History of Medicine (book)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that George Bernard Shaw believed that Douglas Guthrie excluded osteopaths, herbalists, and homoeopaths from his History of Medicine because he either didn't know of them or thought them too unimportant to include?

• Reviewed: Measles resurgence in the United States

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 21:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC).

• Article is long enough (just) and in date, no copyvio, QPQ done, a nice little article on an interesting subject. Hook is cited to subscription journal site, agf though. I've changed Barnard to Bernard, hope that's ok. Looks good to go. Spokoyni (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, I came by to promote this, but one paragraph is uncited per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 15:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, done @Yoninah:. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you. Restoring tick per Spokoyni's review. Yoninah (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

• @Whispyhistory: Just noticed that the hook is over 200 char. Yoninah (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

• Calling Philafrenzy to tighten hook please.Whispyhistory (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

ALT1... that George Bernard Shaw wondered why Douglas Guthrie excluded osteopaths, herbalists, and homoeopaths from his History of Medicine? Philafrenzy (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

• Nice. Reviewer needed for ALT1. Pinging @Spokoyni:. Yoninah (talk) 09:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

• Article has been expanded since I reviewed, but everything looks good, now that the cites have been added. ALT1 is supported by sources, all policies still met. Looks good to go. Spokoyni (talk) 13:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)