Talk:Zuqnin Chronicle

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Bat Yeor quote[edit]

Bat Yeor is not known as a scholar of Syriac or of the seventh century. She's an ideologue and the quote should be stricken

I am totally in agreement with the statement above. I, being myself a scholar of Syriac though i have not yet had the time to study this particular source thoroughly, must say that Bat Yeor 's place is this article is not justified in any way, until someone proves it to be, and that she is not, with out specific, concrete proof a credible source for anything referring to judaism, islam or anything connected, even remotely to these matters. I am therefore cutting out the whole passage referring to Bat Yeor. Anyone who doubts my decision should simply click the link given by her name, and think about the Eurabia-thesis, and what they think about that (before they revert, I mean).72.195.135.205 (talk) 06:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)samuel[reply]

Bat Yeor is not a scholar of Syriac or of the seventh century, but much her work deals with the history of the relationship between Muslims and ancient Jews and Christians. The only argument is whether the quote provided is objective enough. I think however, we can say that the quote does provide at least some insight into the relationship between ancient Christians and Muslims in a majority Muslim area. Vaughjos (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph 4[edit]

The words "as such." in quotes in the first sentence don't make much sense there, and no sources are cited. Does someone who knows a little more about this topic please interpret and fix the issue? I believe deleting the phrase "as such" would resolve this, but I don't want to remove any meaning that may originally have been intended to be there. Vaughjos (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]