Talk:Wolfenstein 3D/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Shaun9876 (talk · contribs) 00:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Seems fine |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Everything but a few things seem cited properly. |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see any... |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yup |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | For the most part it's ok. |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Fine |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars in recent history. |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Both have appropriate fair use rationals. |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Both the images are good and are helpful. |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | The article is in pretty good shape. Other than some minor problems it seems alright. |
OK, so? --Niemti (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Doom II[edit]
The inclusion of Wolfenstein as a secret level in Doom II is cited in many reviews and articles about the game, so I feel confident in adding this to the "spin-offs" list without violating GA. 70.72.221.229 (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)