Talk:University of Southern California
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Southern California article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Delta Phi Kappa was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into University of Southern California. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2020 and 4 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Integrationtool.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Can we use a more modern picture for the logo?[edit]
I looked this up and genuinely thought it was the wrong university. Literally no one ever in history has ever needed the non-modern logo of something, and if they did, that could be listed in the “History” section. I understand copyright issues, but could we just email them or something? Janlopi (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
2024 Commencement[edit]
I'm on mobile currently and won't be able to add this with proper references for a few days, but I think there is a solid argument for including the scandal surrounding the 2024 Commencement Speakers backed up by extensive coverage from multiple outlets, most notably the Los Angeles Times Equirax (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it belongs here just yet. It's not clear if there will be anything that results from this incident except for a bunch of op eds and tweets. If there is something substantive - successful lawsuit, large-scale protests, etc. - then it would almost certainly be something we should mention. But until then there's just not much we can say and it's awfully close to WP:NOTNEWS. ElKevbo (talk) 01:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- alright, looks like the protests have begun. KTLA posting live coverage right now. I'm +1 for information being added to this article but given how the situation is ongoing it might be worth seeing how it plays out. Need to check editing guidelines before I change anything, thanks for the link Equirax (talk) 01:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- B-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- B-Class Los Angeles articles
- Mid-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- B-Class Southern California articles
- High-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class Olympics articles
- Low-importance Olympics articles
- WikiProject Olympics articles
- B-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- B-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance