Talk:United States' Telegraph

United States' Telegraph is currently a Magazines and print journalism good article nominee. Nominated by Generalissima (talk) (it/she) at 06:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Daily newspaper published in Washington, D.C.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).

Did you know nomination[edit]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the chief editor of the United States' Telegraph gouged a rival reporter's eyes inside a Senate office? Source: Smith, Kenneth Laurence (1981). Duff Green and the United States' Telegraph, 1826-1837, p. 70 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3580&context=etd
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Stonewall Inn

Created by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This should be interesting. I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Wonderful work! I enjoyed reading this (I just love old newspapers! ). Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact does sound interesting, but unfortunately, according to Fletcher M. Green in "Duff Green, Militant Journalist of the Old School," Duff Green "denied that he was armed or that he gouged Sparhawk's eyes," and it doesn't help that it was Sparhawk who made the original charge. There's not much of a way to prove that this for sure happened, so a different hook might need to be picked unless I can for sure confirm that this truly happened. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgot to ping @Generalissima and @BeanieFan11. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Why not just "that the chief editor of the United States' Telegraph allegedly gouged a rival reporter's eyes inside a Senate office?" Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm a bit reluctant still, but I suppose it works better. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - The article/citations would need to be adjusted accordingly Generalissima. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]