Talk:Triangulum/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 14:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I think this is an exceptionally well-written small article. Good job, editors.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- I see no original research.
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Seems quite stable after the last round of heavy edits.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- All images are free and tagged with permission.
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Images are relevant.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I've no problem passing this article.
- Pass or Fail: