Talk:The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film)

The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 30, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sessue Hayakawa, who played the role of Tsuru Aoki's father in the film The Wrath of the Gods, married her the same year the film was released?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film).

Wikipedia

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will leave some initial comments some point tomorrow. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing the format of my reviews now (so it's less awkward):

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Initial comments[edit]

The lead is well-written and can see no problems here, so this meets the GA criteria
"Toya decides to convert and marry Tom at the local Japanese-American mission" - marry at the local Japanese-American mission? I don't quite understand?

The American mission in Japan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:25, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Ince had constructed a very large village in his studio Inceville" - where was his studio located?
"Four months prior to the release, New York Motion Picture Corporation put an ad"- advertisement?
"The film was released in a new theater called The Strand, on 7 June 1914" - was it premièred here? Where was The Strand located?
The film's DVD was released in the United States on 18 March 2008." - is there a reference for this?
All the references are fine and the citations are in the correct places so this meets the GA criteria.

@Dr. Blofeld: This is a generally well-written article, there are very few prose problems here so the review is somewhat short! The only minor problems I found were a few confusing sentences that needs clarifying. I'll put this one on hold for the standard seven days. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC) @Jaguar: OK now?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Close - promoted[edit]

Thanks for addressing those concerns so quickly! The article is well-written and referenced so in short it meets the GA criteria. I couldn't find any other problems with it despite the review feeling short. Just out of curiosity, is this film in the public domain now? I thought I have seen this one before but I'd like to watch it! Anyway well done on the extra work. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]