Talk:Silverymoon

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Copyvio?[edit]

Which page came first? Most of the current text of this article was introduced in May 2005. So the question is, how old is the Loremaster page? 204.153.84.10 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Loremaster website is only a year old. The Wikia version was created about a year younger after the text was posted on this Wikipedia page; even if the text here was copied from somewhere else ultimately, the text at these other links was apparently copied from Wikipedia. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely sceptical that the text inserted in these revisions is original to Wikipedia. It reads very much like it was copied from a sourcebook. That text still forms the core of the article, and the rest is entirely in-universe anyway. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was possibly copied from somewhere, but until such a source is identified, I don't think it can be properly called copyvio. If I have time (much) later today, I'll check a few books that I have to see if any of it matches. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I can tell you is that it was not copied from the book Silver Marches, which I had pegged as the #1 suspect, unless it was very skillfully done. I'll have to check other sources later. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sure. I've removed the speedy nomination for now. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I also checked a few of the earliest sources, which I didn't really suspect, but once you rule out the obvious ones... 24.148.0.83 (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect redirect target[edit]

please forgive my reidrect target error. I knew the fancruft ran deep and wide, but i had NO idea that it held THAT many layers. -- The Red Pen of Doom 19:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]