Talk:Rock parrot/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Comments
- You link parrot in the lead but not lore. I definitely know what a parrot is, but I definitely don't know what a lore is.
- I guess "It was described by Gould" is a "thing", i.e. you don't say which "Gould", I think for the majority of our readers there's no reason to omit his first name.
- You link Western Australia in the lead but not South Australia, any logic?
- " volume of Birds of Australia," the book is piped to a redirect, and should be in italics.
- I've never seen "informant" used in this context, usually only for people splitting on others... is this a commonly used biology research term?
- "colonisation it was common" I would replace "it" with "the species" here.
- " it its current scientific name." which is...?
- "One of six species of..." mildly confused by the structure of this sentence which seems like a fragment, followed by a semi-colon...
- "evade an explosion of" that doesn't seem particularly enyclopedic in tone.
- "30-20 million" dash, not hyphen.
- You could link "nominate subspecies" as it's a highly technical term.
- Link "tarsus".
- "Robe, South Australia in" comma before "in" per MOS:GEOCOMMA.
- "over 160 km" convert to miles.
- "Jurien Bay" is linked twice but to different targets, potentially confusing.
- What is "pigface"?!
- " in favourable years" what does that actually mean?
- " moving a short distance behind a tussock or rock if observers move " repeat of move is a little jarring.
- " jugflower (Adenanthos cuneatus), .[18]" remove space and comma.
- No "the" in the full name of IUCN.
- " Albany, Western Australia in" comma before in, and why isn't this linked?
- "Like most species of parrots" no need to link "parrot" at this late stage!
- " A Greek-English " should be an en-dash, not a hyphen.
That's all I have, the article is already good enough to pass the basic GAN requirements, so these comments would just be the icing on the cake. I'll put the review on hold while we go through them. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Happy with the changes and the article easily passes. Good work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)