Talk:Quarter sovereign

Quarter sovereign is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 20, 2024.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 9, 2024	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Numismatics: British currency Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British currency task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

On 21 March 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from Quarter sovereign (British coin) to Quarter sovereign. The result of the discussion was moved.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Double florin (British coin) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III obverse?[edit]

Is there an image available of the new Charles III obverse mentioned in the article? – Sca (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I'm aware of. I used the Elizabeth II one from 2009 because it was on Heritage Auctions' website and I have their permission to upload their images, but the quarter sovereigns they have auctioned are all Elizabeth II. I used an Elizabeth II. Even though the design is copyrighted the image can have a suitable license tag. I suppose you could grab a Charles III image off the Royal Mint's website but neither the image nor the design would be free, and the fair use rationale is better in my view if the image can have a free license even if the design is copyright for another 25 years. Wehwalt (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]