Talk:Paul Jackson (bassist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality[edit]

This article currently resembles a press release type of biography - it's too praising and contains too much unimportant detail. Dancarney 12:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it, it's a verbatim copy from his official website. See below. Voceditenore (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.pauljacksonbass.com/bio.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 08:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Sufficiently expanded (550 B/98 words to 3338 B/572 words). Eligible per RD. Earwig looks good, article looks good. Personally prefer ALT1. Vaticidalprophet 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]