Talk:Opinion polling for the 2021 Peruvian general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Peru

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Poor citation of polling and IDICE[edit]

The use of IDICE polls here is questionable, especially when the citation source is a right-wing Twitter account (https://twitter.com/Datoworld/status/1388162981712773126). The sources for the last poll don't even share the same numbers. Not to mention the questionable links the pollster shares with right-wing influences. We can do better than this. --ZX2021 (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Going off this, the new "CIT" poll being cited now does not have a full report with methodology on the pollster's website (http://citopinion.pe/publicaciones_opinion_y_mercado.html). If no one can track down the full report with methodology on the internet, then that poll should not be included. This is the standard across Wikipedia as far as I know. What are we doing here? --ZX2021 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Avanza País 2021.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

FREPAP Logo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Analysis" section uses left-wing smear terms...[edit]

such as "Catholic extremism", "far-right" and "neoliberal". Sounds like the author of this article has a personal bias in favor of the left and far-left causes. Therefore the article is not objective and neutrally written. 2003:DA:C72C:BF00:DD16:8E57:402A:B06E (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]