Talk:North Cheam tube station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the Northern line, already containing the southernmost station on the London Underground, was proposed in 1946 to be extended to North Cheam? Source: Report to the Ministry of War Transport. Railway (London Plan) Committee. 1946.

Created by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 02:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: I'd perhaps tweak the hook to read "... that in 1946, the Northern Line, already containing the southernmost station on the London Underground, was proposed to be extended to North Cheam?" However, the proposed hook sounds perfectly fine itself. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would comment that whilst this station was one of many proposed in the 1946 Report, none of those proposed were built or even taken to the first step of doing so, which is to submit a bill to parliament. Over the history of the London Underground there were literally dozens of lines and hundreds of stations proposed that never went any further than lines and dots on plans. Because of this, WikiProject London Transport, whose scope this article falls under, has a policy of only creating articles for stations that actually went through the parliamentary approvals process and received the permission to be constructed. The distinction between this and the station discussed at Cheam tube station is that it did have parliamentary approval, but was later dropped. For stations that were built and are still served by the London Underground there is a featured list at List of London Underground stations; for those that were permitted and then not built there is a featured list at List of former and unopened London Underground stations. This article wouldn't fit into either of these lists. The information might be better to merge this into the article on Cheam. The proposed extension from Morden to North Cheam is mentioned in the Morden tube station. DavidCane (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I thought this met WP:GNG myself, but if you're worried then I suggest taking it to AfD. If it survives, then I would propose the following hook:
ALT2: ... that in 1946, the London Underground's Northern line, already containing its southernmost station, was proposed to be extended even further south to North Cheam? --Launchballer 21:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It has come to my attention that the Northern line was proposed to be extended further to Epsom railway station via North Cheam, with a stop at Castle Parade in Ewell. I'll be writing an article about that station when Epsom library reopens. Therefore, if - and only if - this is still open then, I will be proposing the following hook:
ALT3: ... that the London Underground's Northern line, already containing its southernmost station, was proposed to be extended even further south to Epsom via North Cheam and Ewell?
But don't hold up the nomination to wait for it.--Launchballer 12:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]