Talk:Mo Moulton

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Financial Times link[edit]

I took out the link to the Financial Times article because it requires a subscription to read or even to see the title or any other information about it that would help someone find it in a subscription database. ... discospinster _talk 23:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that. This is an encyclopedia of human knowledge, not an encyclopedia of only the stuff we can find on the web. And obviously your characterization of the source is incorrect as I was able to find and look at it. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]