Jump to content

Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MaranoFan, I'll review this. LOVI33 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing this article, LOVI33. Looking forward to it!--NØ 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Sourced to Tidal now.
  • Is the 2014 recording year sourced?
  • Are you sure Soul should be included as a genre since it refers to solely to its references?
  • One of the critics stated it has a "modernized throwback soul sound".
  • Per Template:Infobox song, later releases should be included in the article, not infobox so remove Atlantic records.
  • Isn't this Puth's debut single? If so you should add something about that in the opening sentence.
  • Target music critics to Music journalism

Background and release[edit]

Composition[edit]

Critical reception[edit]

Chart performance[edit]

North America[edit]

  • Looks good!

Oceania and Europe[edit]

Music video[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Live performances[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Track listing[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Credits and personnel[edit]

Charts[edit]

  • Weekly charts says 2014–15 but wasn't it released in 2015?

Certifications[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Release history[edit]

  • Remove streaming, sources are from iTunes.

References[edit]

  • Make sure all of these are archived.
  • Copyvio score needs work at 43.2%. Fix your quoting from ref 3
  • Change publisher to BBC for ref 8
  • Remove target to Entertainment Weekly on ref 19
  • Ref 51 is missing a website or publisher.
  • Ref 56: "jeff" → "Jeff"

External links[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold for now. This article was really well written. Good job! LOVI33 17:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've either done or responded to all of your comments.--NØ 03:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Great!  Pass. LOVI33 12:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.