A fact from Les fleurs dédaignées appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Les fleurs dédaignées is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
After discussion at WT:DYK#Les fleurs dédaignées, this page was pulled from the DYK section of the mainpage and redirected to the article it was an unattributed copy of. It is useless to have a page that is mostly a copy of another existing page, and it is not allowed to copy text from another Wikipedia article without attribution. Fram (talk) 08:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is the English translation of 'Les Fleurs Dédaignées' given on the page. Is that anything like an official title or can I improve that version to a more accurate "spurned flowers"? --Svartalf (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, we should probably not use either. The English title used by the National Gallery of Australia uses "scorned flowers", so we should probably use that. Thanks for raising the issue. hamiltonstone (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]